Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

What is sad is that this is far more likely

 

From FF

 

 

At 7.18pm this evening I received an email from a solicitor acting on behalf of Rangers saying that a post had been made on the site which appeared to incite an attack on the car and home by a director.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to The Sun, this is the 'threat':

 

A user had called for fans to get in touch in private about a demo and complained when only two did. Another poster responded : "What's your plan? Why the secrecy ? For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other".

Edited by Frankie
Link to post
Share on other sites

According to The Sun, this is the 'threat':

 

A user had called for fans to get in touch in private about a demo and complained when only two did. Another poster responded : "What's your plan? Why the secrecy ? For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other".

 

That's a joke then as that is not a threat. Club wasting our money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to The Sun, this is the 'threat':

 

A user had called for fans to get in touch in private about a demo and complained when only two did. Another poster responded : "What's your plan? Why the secrecy ? For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other".

 

If this is true, then the police should dismiss the complaint out of hand. However, the person who posted it wasn't too clever, the meaning is clear but by saying "For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other" it might imply that folks were up for the wrong thing; it would have been better to say "For all we know you could be planning to hold a protest banner up outside the ground or torch Stockbridges car/house. Folk might be up for one but not the other".

 

Police/lawyer note: I am not making any such suggestions.

 

Edit: It would have been better not to say it at all.

Edited by BrahimHemdani
Link to post
Share on other sites

According to The Sun, this is the 'threat':

 

A user had called for fans to get in touch in private about a demo and complained when only two did. Another poster responded : "What's your plan? Why the secrecy ? For all we know you could be planning to torch Stockbridges car/house or hold a protest banner up outside the ground. Folk might be up for one but not the other".

 

Are you sure you won't get a call from a lawyer for repeating it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.