Requisitioners go to Court of Session - Adjourned until 14th

[forlanssister 3,059]

Eh!, FFS, why the fuck is this being released through that arsehole?

 

Truly bizarre behaviour but alas such stunts no longer shock....

[ian1964 10,455]

Ian it's a common phrase so I wasn't having a go at you in particular.

 

If there's change it'll be passing from one set of businessmen in blazers to another. They might be better but I just don't feel it fits in with the concept of us getting our club 'back'.

 

Look!, David Murray abused our club for years and most of us fans never really batted an eyelid as we were successful,the way our club is being run now is fucking appalling and embarrassing,it has never been so bad,IMO. It needs to change now.

 

And if it wasn't directed at me then why quote me and say ''I get what he means''?.

[ian1964 10,455]

Truly bizarre behaviour but alas such stunts no longer shock....

 

But yet so typical of these wankers!.

[simplythebest 0]

Look!, David Murray abused our club for years and most of us fans never really batted an eyelid as we were successful,the way our club is being run now is fucking appalling and embarrassing,it has never been so bad,IMO. It needs to change now.

 

And if it wasn't directed at me then why quote me and say ''I get what he means''?.

You don't need to convince me about David Murray being a bastard.

 

You said the phrase, I said similar on Saturday to someone when I saw the banners. I apologise if it came across as personal.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

You have to laugh at jack and the board. Who in their right mind would trust them. Talks would have gone on till it was to late and they would have conceded nothing .

 

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4

[the gunslinger 3,366]

possibly what he means is us getting back a football club that isn't a joke.

 

PS - How much have the requisitioners invested in our club in order to get a say?

 

For the avoidance of doubt - I have no bias here and rate all the players internally and externally as worthless as each other.

 

It seems to me though that there is one dodgy party who did make an investment and another that didn't.

 

The two biggest actual investors are with mccoll.

 

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4

[crucible 0]

You have to laugh at jack and the board. Who in their right mind would trust them. Talks would have gone on till it was to late and they would have conceded nothing .

 

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4

 

What has been conceded, nothing that I can see looks like a waste of money and everyone's time, the order sought by Keen QC to postpone wasn't granted.in fact nothing was granted.

[forlanssister 3,059]

What has been conceded, nothing that I can see looks like a waste of money and everyone's time, the order sought by Keen QC to postpone wasn't granted.in fact nothing was granted.

 

Nor did the board succeed in their attempts to have the action dismissed did they?

[crucible 0]

Seems clear enough to me at least.

 

The Petitioners sought interim orders to prevent the Annual General Meeting of the Company from taking place on 24 October 2013. No such orders were granted by the court.

 

Certain legal arguments in relation to the validity of the section 338 notices have been continued to a new hearing to take place on Monday 14 October 2013 at the Court of Session in Edinburgh. Whilst the Company considers its legal position on these matters to be robust, the Petitioners have also confirmed that if their arguments succeed in relation to the validity of the s338 notices, the Petitioners agree that the Annual General Meeting should proceed to take place on 24 October 2013 as long as their proposed resolutions are circulated as soon as reasonably practicable after the hearing concludes and before the date of the Annual General Meeting. The Annual General Meeting of the Company is, therefore, set to proceed on 24 October 2013.

[Zappa 0]

What has been conceded, nothing that I can see looks like a waste of money and everyone's time, the order sought by Keen QC to postpone wasn't granted.in fact nothing was granted.

 

The board & their PR rat Jack Irvine are trying to make a big deal out of the fact that their offer to have a meeting wasn't taken up. The fact of the matter is that most of us who've been following these events for the past 2 months know fine well that it's gone way past the point of meeting Mather & co for a chin-wag about proposals.

 

The board has allowed very little room for negotiation, while blocking and stalling continuously throughout this saga. It took the imposters on our Club's current board 4 weeks to start questioning the validity of McColl & co's Requisition, then when they received everything they had asked for, the dirty chancers got Strand Hanson to veto and block it. That's the same Strand Hanson who were working as the companies' AIM Nominated Advisor until a few days ago.

 

Why did our 2nd Nominated Advisor in only 3 months (they only just took over from Cenkos in July) decide to withdraw their services? Did the chancers running our club tell them to veto a legal requisition? Genuine question.

Edited October 4, 2013 by Zappa