calscot 0 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 Can I just point out, the only reason that this article is being accepted as truthful is that we already know the truth of the story which tallies with it - as we already know it, what is the usefulness of the article to us? In the end, all it is, is another negative story to spread to those outside the family, for our enemies to gloat over and to help, pull the wool over the neutrals and turn them against us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 Can I just point out, the only reason that this article is being accepted as truthful is that we already know the truth of the story which tallies with it - as we already know it, what is the usefulness of the article to us? In the end, all it is, is another negative story to spread to those outside the family, for our enemies to gloat over and to help, pull the wool over the neutrals and turn them against us. Be realistic, It's a newspaper - it has pages to fill, we give it things to write about and people buy it to read them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 That's too narrow and defensive an interpretation to put on it from Calscot. Just as Wilson of The Herald did, Jackson is summing up what has happened and, at the same time, filling his column inches with what his readers like to see - stuff about the OF. But more than that, it's Jackson campaigning on behalf of his source, Paul Murray, ahead of the AGM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossy 0 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 And to be fair to the Record, there are a great many Rangers fans who rely on such organs (sic) for their information. We should not assume that all Rangers fans are as well informed as the online community. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 I think people are missing the point. Jackson is someone who spews out anti-Rangers stuff all the time. Just because he's right for once in a negative story, doesn't mean he's worth listening to. Wilson is a different kettle of fish - he doesn't write with an agenda, he's an actual journalist and news reporter. If Rangers fans are uniformed then please get them to read another paper, otherwise they will only be indoctrinated rather than educated. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.