Jump to content

 

 

TRS: The possible dream - fan ownership


Recommended Posts

A simple but effective message from this bear which I enjoyed reading earlier.

 

http://www.therangersstandard.co.uk/index.php/articles/fan-culture/293-the-possible-dream-fan-ownership

 

Scenario one: It’s the 24th of whenever 2013, Paul Murray, Scott Murdoch, Malcolm Murray and Alex Wilson have failed in their bid to be put on the board at Rangers at the much delayed AGM and the bad/good guys, depending on which side of this lunatic spectrum you fall on, have prevailed. Three strikes and you’re out Mr Murray we need to move on.

 

What now? Do we sit back and wait and see if the doom prophecies are true or someone on the board produces the proverbial rabbit out of the hat and finds new backers? Do we let the board sell and leaseback the assets after a failed round of funding being supported by city or the fans due to the level of mistrust? Do we just sit and bitch at each other on twitter and actually contribute the square root of Craig Whyte’s wealth, zero?

 

Scenario two: The good guys/bad guys have won. Dave King rides along Edmiston Drive on his Springbok weighed down with Rand closely followed by Cash McColl and their trusty retainers the Blue Knights plus one. What now? Do we get fobbed-off with a membership scheme allowing you a discount off a Rangers garden gnome in the club shop? Do we get fan representation in the form of a Director hand-picked by the board? Do they lose interest when their other business interests start going down the Swannee and Rangers are the last thing on their mind?

 

I’ll tell you what we do, for either scenario, we buy the Club.

 

Impossible you say, really?

 

If Hearts or Dunfermline fans had been as negative/apathetic/disinterested as many in the Rangers support appear to be, Foundation of Hearts would not be the preferred bidder to take their club out of administration and Dunfermline supporters wouldn’t own their club. Neither would fans of Portsmouth, Stenhousemuir, Clyde, Darlington or many others I’ve never heard of like Eastbourne Borough!

 

I would hazard a guess that if all their supporters decided to visit Ibrox en masse there would still be enough room in the Director’s box for the requisitioners and the current board to trade insults and flick bits of pie at each other.

 

Look at the numbers, Foundation of Hearts have 7,500 members all paying on average, I would give an educated guess, £18 per month, that’s £135,000 per month and £1,620,000 per year straight into the Club’s coffers and that figure is the icing on the cake of season ticket sales etc. Their average attendance was 15,300 last season.

 

Let’s apply that level of uptake (49%) to Rangers. Average attendance so far this season has been 43,000 supporters. Ok so 49% of that is 21,070, yet again we’ve beaten Hearts already! I digress. Let’s say Rangers fans were a tiny bit more generous than Hearts fans and paid £18.72, the date of our founding.

 

So that’s 21,070 members all paying on average £18.72, that’s £394,430 per month.

 

£4,733,164 per year, I’ll let that sink in, £4,733,164 per year. Unreal £4.7 million pounds per year!

 

In two years that’s £9,466,329, three years £14,199,492 it is absolutely mind blowing and that is only with 21,000 fans doing this. Ah, but we’re not going to be able to buy the club from the administrators, we’re not in administration, the board are doing a splendid/rubbish job (delete as appropriate).

 

This is where we have a massive advantage over Hearts, Dunfermline and any other clubs previously mentioned: our shares are listed on the AIM so anyone can buy them! On current prices after one year we could own at least 13% of the stock in Rangers, year two 26% etc etc.

 

If we got really organised we could realistically demand a Director or two on the board and have properly run elections for these posts and ANY member could put themselves up as a candidate. You could be the head honcho in the Blue Order or even an ordinary season ticket holder as long as you were voted in by a majority of the members.

 

The potential for a scheme such as this knows no bounds. Guys who can’t buy season tickets because of location can have a say in how the Club is run. NARSA and ORSA members could all join and even Bears living in Baku or Timbuktu. If guys from these places got enough votes they’d could sit on the board alongside Bears from Glasgow, Belfast London or wherever you are from.

 

What do I get for my £18.72 I hear you ask? You get a restful night for the remainder of your life knowing you have secured Rangers for your children and your children’s children.

 

It really is the possible dream; anyone can buy shares in Rangers, if only there was such a scheme in place.

 

Graham McLaren is 46 and taking a self-imposed twitter break, when he’s back he can be followed @gazborangers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave King doesn't or didn't appear to give it any backing, as it is from the day late rhebel it should be acceptable as gospel.

 

Dave King interview: Fans takeover plan for Rangers never had a chance to succeeding

25 Jun 2010 00:00

 

EXCLUSIVE: DAVE King has dismissed as a pipedream the idea Rangers could ever be owned and operated by its fans.

 

Dave King has dismissed as a pipedream the idea Rangers could ever be owned and operated by its fans.

 

The Ibrox director says his club's supporters already invest more in their team than any other followers in the world and it's unrealistic to expect more.

 

He says the concept of fan ownership, backed by bodies such as the Rangers Trust, won bank and Murray Group support during the club's darkest days last season.

 

But he emphatically stated it was always a non-starter in his eyes and there is no great groundswell of support for fan ownership among the majority of the Light Blues legions.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave King doesn't or didn't appear to give it any backing, as it is from the day late rhebel it should be acceptable as gospel.

 

Dave King interview: Fans takeover plan for Rangers never had a chance to succeeding

25 Jun 2010 00:00

 

EXCLUSIVE: DAVE King has dismissed as a pipedream the idea Rangers could ever be owned and operated by its fans.

 

Dave King has dismissed as a pipedream the idea Rangers could ever be owned and operated by its fans.

 

The Ibrox director says his club's supporters already invest more in their team than any other followers in the world and it's unrealistic to expect more.

 

He says the concept of fan ownership, backed by bodies such as the Rangers Trust, won bank and Murray Group support during the club's darkest days last season.

 

But he emphatically stated it was always a non-starter in his eyes and there is no great groundswell of support for fan ownership among the majority of the Light Blues legions.

 

That article is over 3 years old. Opinions/Agenda's can change in that time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I enjoyed the article and was pleased Graham kept it simple - using easy to understand figures and perhaps even embarrass us all to a small degree with examples of how other fans have managed to get such schemes off the ground.

 

Despite that, I think we're still some way off any possible fan ownership; in the short term at least. More realistic for me is an initial membership scheme (along the same lines as the above) whereby we can examine what is possible with respect to improving how we're represented at the club. After all, not only does the vehicle need to be perfect to convince more fans that this is a genuine solution but we need to show that we have fans that can sit on the board of the club and act responsibly throughout.

 

FWIW, I believe McColl, Murray and King would consider such a strategy and the club have also suggest something similar. Obviously though it's debatable just how far either party would take this - perhaps seeing it more of a money-making exercise as opposed to a genuine vehicle for constitutional change at our club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only 'scheme' we have pretty much rallied together on was the RFFF. It would need similar figureheads to be involved (trust wise) for something like this to be achievable I think.

 

Walter being the example, he is a fan and has no connection to the club anymore. If he were to spear a movement of such i think it would gather a great deal of backing.

 

The 'bowling club cliques' we see today are embarrassing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.