Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

That's fine, but do you think we should allow this unlicenced fishing to continue unabated or do you think we should pushback in some fashion?

 

It should ideally be situation dependent and be dealt with properly rather than unprofessionally with scatter-gun tactics and useless, empty threats as has been going on since Whyte took over.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lawwell is a classless oaf playing to the gallery. Tims will lap that kind of shite up, but the CEO of Celtic should be above that kind of comment.

That being said at some point we're going to need to develop a slightly thicker skin and laugh this kind of stuff off. As long as it so clearly bothers us the longer it will go on. Ultimately who gives a fuck what Lawwell or anyone at Celtic thinks.

 

Recent evidence suggests quite the opposite in Scotland. Look at the perma-offended. So little gets said against them compared to what should because they complain like fuck. From fan to the boardroom.

Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not about a thicker skin, Amms. They want us to draw a line under the past, but they keep pushing their bullshit. It's time to call him to task, especially as Bearger says 'He's a member of the SFA board and should be representing all clubs, not insulting them.'

 

Do you think this will stop them then? Nothing will happen here, everyone who isn't a Rangers fan thinks this is funny and our reaction to it is even funnier. We can complain and I agree with those who say Lawwell should never have said it, he shouldn't he should know better, but it was a Tim who asked the question at their AGM. They ask questions about Rangers at the Celtic AGM, but as long as we keep reacting to it they'll keep pushing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Recent evidence suggests quite the opposite in Scotland. Look at the perma-offended. So little gets said against them compared to what should because they complain like fuck. From fan to the boardroom.

 

I don't really know what you mean SA. As long as they know we react to this they'll say it. Take the power away from them, don't get offended laugh it off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we play this smart, we can turn it into our advantage.

 

Lawell's remark means that his position with the SFA is untenable and we should insist that he resign that position ....unless he makes a public statement retracting the remark and acknowledging publicly that Rangers is the same club that was founded in 1872. That would go some way to shutting Timmy up.

 

However in the absense of a board that can tie its shoelaces with the lights on, I don't expect the opportunity to be taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Liewell makes too many mistakes but this one is a gift. We must demand he comes out with a statement that Rangers aren't a new club. Otherwise his positions in the SFA & SPFL are untenable because both recognise Rangers as the same club. Let's see how good Jack Irvine is..........................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.