Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Comes across as RM promoting an agenda and no one buying it. Only time I see people like j1mgg is to promote this agenda.

 

I guess like many, to me it makes him and RM appear compromised and biased and therefore I won't buy it even if they may be making some valid points. At pains to tell people how they only deal in facts and then don't.

 

Just my opinion.

 

I am just posting something that was written on another forum that wasn't on here so people can read it. I understand a lot of people have already made up their mind, but there is no harm in them learning/reading more. If it had all of been hear say I would not of bothered, but the person has went out their way to back it up and remove personal opinion. It just seems that anything good about the board gets jumped on straight away here, surely the more information provided about both sides can only be good.

 

If the names in the article had been replaced with members of the current board I am guessing the tone towards it would be completely different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

spent doesn't mean that it is no longer on his record, only that he doesn't need to reveal it to potential employers. It doesn't change the fact that he is a convicted criminal. If he is convicted of another offence, the Judge will be able to take it into account when deciding on his sentance.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I am just posting something that was written on another forum that wasn't on here so people can read it. I understand a lot of people have already made up their mind, but there is no harm in them learning/reading more. If it had all of been hear say I would not of bothered, but the person has went out their way to back it up and remove personal opinion. It just seems that anything good about the board gets jumped on straight away here, surely the more information provided about both sides can only be good. If the names in the article had been replaced with members of the current board I am guessing the tone towards it would be completely different.

 

But it's not merely posting something that was written on another forum is it? It ends up as forcefully trying to put certain perspectives over.

No debate at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites
spent doesn't mean that it is no longer on his record, only that he doesn't need to reveal it to potential employers. It doesn't change the fact that he is a convicted criminal. If he is convicted of another offence, the Judge will be able to take it into account when deciding on his sentance.

 

As I said his conviction is spent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.