forlanssister 3,050 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 You are in fact correct about the email account, I misread between the email and the RM accounts. However, you still speculated about the RM account in April and then re-iterated that assumption as a fact yesterday. You then state that he registered for email notification of any pm's to that account. How would you know that? By stating that both RM and Rangers would know that you are, by implication, saying that one of them had to be the source for the TRS article. Am I really? Go back and check the thread on RM where I raised the matter initially and where I make clear it I did not think it leaked from anyone whatsoever at RM and also please show where I have claimed that RFC (their employees or agents) were behind the leak of the story. Of course you're ignoring the part that a big mouthed hubristic egoist may have or even may have not have played in his own downfall. Keep digging if you wish but desist with the false accusations. How I know what I know is between myself and whoever told me, but bear in mind RM did not delete the thread. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Unless the RST identifies where the real problem lies very quickly, they may never recover from this. And it certainly isnt Toxic Jack, RM or VB. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Am I really? Go back and check the thread on RM where I raised the matter initially and where I make clear it I did not think it leaked from anyone whatsoever at RM and also please show where I have claimed that RFC (their employees or agents) were behind the leak of the story. Of course you're ignoring the part that a big mouthed hubristic egoist may have or even may have not have played in his own downfall. Keep digging if you wish but desist with the false accusations. How I know what I know is between myself and whoever told me, but bear in mind RM did not delete the thread. Oh stop acting it. You give us two choices by your implication in post #194, either RM or Rangers. Rm issued a statement and you yourself have just said you do not believe they were complicit, that leaves someone at Rangers. There is no false accusation there, the implication is obvious. Of course, since we don't know for sure that 'IamRangers' is IA, then all we have is your secret sources' word that IA did in fact register for email notification of pm's via his @rangers.co.uk email address. We know you are talking about IA because post #194 is a direct answer to Gunslinger's musing that IA contravened the DPA, for which Zappa chastised him no doubt in an attempt to curb any more speculation. So, is it true or is the whole thing supposition? I guess only you will know. To be clear, I am in no way attempting to defend IA, his actions while at Rangers or his dismissal. I don't want to say anymore. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWee BlueDevil 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Unless the RST identifies where the real problem lies very quickly' date=' they may never recover from this. And it certainly isnt Toxic Jack, RM or VB.[/quote']Please go and pontificate somewhere else D'Art for crying out loud! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Please go and pontificate somewhere else D'Art for crying out loud! No Im perfectly comfortable here thank you. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 We know you are talking about IA because post #194 is a direct answer to Gunslinger's musing that IA contravened the DPA, for which Zappa chastised him no doubt in an attempt to curb any more speculation. You've got the facts wrong again here barca. Gunslinger said that RM had breached the DPA and I asked that such allegations not be posted here without proof. It wasn't to curb any speculation either, the request was simply based on the fact that we can't have such allegations about other Gers forums being posted here unless they can be substantiated. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWee BlueDevil 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 No Im perfectly comfortable here thank you.Wishful thinking on my part I'm afraid. Ah well back on ignore you go. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Unless the RST identifies where the real problem lies very quickly' date=' they may never recover from this. And it certainly isnt Toxic Jack, RM or VB.[/quote'] I'm sure you'll agree that there's been a lot of things posted on forums today which are certainly not helping the situation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Wishful thinking on my part I'm afraid. Ah well back on ignore you go. Thank you. So glad Ive got your permission. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 I'm sure you'll agree that there's been a lot of things posted on forums today which are certainly not helping the situation. I think the situation was not helped several years ago when the wrong decisions were taken. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.