der Berliner 3,240 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 With this board that and more. We'll address that topic in 3 years again then. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 yeah lets waste 3 years 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,240 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 yeah lets waste 3 years Cannot follow that line of thought, but need no explanation either. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,410 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 “You deserve answers to the following: “1. Why does your board refuse to disclose who is behind Blue Pitch Holdings and Margarita Holdings, the original backers of Charles Green and Imran Ahmad? “2. Why does your board refuse to engage with you apart from issuing veiled threats that if you do not continue to buy season tickets the club will be in financial difficulty? “3. Why does your board fail to acknowledge the critical need for fresh investment? “4. Why does your board refuse to engage with our group, four individuals with credible business credentials and access to public and private investment to help the club and who are prepared to help the club for free? “5. Why does your board continue to support Brian Stockbridge when his position is clearly untenable and who had to repay his bonus to secure the vote of Laxey? “6. Why does your board continue to retain the services of Jack Irvine, a man who insulted John Greig, the greatest ever Ranger?” Will these questions be asked?, will these questions be answered?. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Question 6 is a pretty lame way to attack Irvine. It's a shame to have to use your weakest ammunition against an enemy in order to appeal to the masses, but needs must I suppose. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 “You deserve answers to the following: “1. Why does your board refuse to disclose who is behind Blue Pitch Holdings and Margarita Holdings, the original backers of Charles Green and Imran Ahmad? http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rangers-boardroom-battle-paul-murray-2935486 Surely it is not up to the Board to release the names - if they did could that not possibly breach stockmarket/AIM rules??? Whoever is behind Blue Pitch & Margarita have requested to remain anonymous....if the names of those involved are to be known, then surely it HAS to come from the holding groups themselves??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTP 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Question 6 is a pretty lame way to attack Irvine. It's a shame to have to use your weakest ammunition against an enemy in order to appeal to the masses, but needs must I suppose. Sometimes the way to fight sewer rats is just to get down in the gutter yourself. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Surely it is not up to the Board to release the names - if they did could that not possibly breach stockmarket/AIM rules??? Whoever is behind Blue Pitch & Margarita have requested to remain anonymous....if the names of those involved are to be known, then surely it HAS to come from the holding groups themselves??? Where do the SFA/SPFL stand on this. Surely they have a duty to ensure that their articles are being followed. How do they know that the anonymous beneficiaries don't have controlling interests in any other football club? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Where do the SFA/SPFL stand on this. Surely they have a duty to ensure that their articles are being followed. How do they know that the anonymous beneficiaries don't have controlling interests in any other football club? They are simply investors....they have no direct connection to the running of the club - the SFA/SPFL have no say. This is exactly why Mad Vlad got away with criticising the SAL/APL so often - he owned the club, but officially was not involved in running it. Neither BPH or Margarita have controlling interests in the club. Mike Ashley has a controlling interest in Newcastle, but not in RFC - no issue. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 They are simply investors....they have no direct connection to the running of the club - the SFA/SPFL have no say. No direct connection to the running of the club? They were the first to requisition an EGM and force boardroom changes. They have systematically placed their own men on the PLC & Club boards. They've consolidated their shares into a block by giving the voting rights to one of their men on the board in order to retain control after the AGM. How on earth does that equate to having no direct connection to the running of the club? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.