Super Cooper 0 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Do you think it is important enough to bring this up at the AGM? I would like to know exactly how much the club are making from both Puma and Sports Direct. A major revenue stream for our club, i think it is crucial we find out the details. I have heard rumours, seen loads of questions but no answers. I am left to assume it's not great only because if it was worth anything Green would have been telling the world when it was signed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,330 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 I doubt the directors will reveal commecially sensitive information at the AGM so there will be nothing said to calm our fears. There's also the issue that it would inherently be less than Celtic's at the moment given the relative lack of exposure we have and therefore we wouldn't want to publicise that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Be better of asking why if it is a 51%-49% deal in our favour why do Sports Direct's shares count double in any vote regarding financial matters? There could be £20m laying in Rangers Retail's bank account but if Sports Direct say no dividend will be paid then no dividend will be paid. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 frightening...... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted December 18, 2013 Share Posted December 18, 2013 The only thing Green and Ahmed were good at negotiating was their own bonuses. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted December 18, 2013 Share Posted December 18, 2013 Be better of asking why if it is a 51%-49% deal in our favour why do Sports Direct's shares count double in any vote regarding financial matters? There could be £20m laying in Rangers Retail's bank account but if Sports Direct say no dividend will be paid then no dividend will be paid. It should be painfully obvious by now that when it comes to Rangers, you don't need anything resembling a majority share to be in a position to run the show. That said, since Green left the Rangers Retail board at the end of October our sole representative has been Brian Stockbridge. The other two directors are Sports Direct. Doesn't exactly inspire confidence does it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted December 19, 2013 Author Share Posted December 19, 2013 Profit from merchandising with Sports Direct is right down the middle. 51/49. Doesn't look too good at all to be honest. Who the hell employed by Rangers thought that was a good deal? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.