Calgacus 8 Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 Yep, no point in either biting or feedings ****s and trolls. Just too distasteful. It is yet another day for them to gloat, but best to just keep the forum as clean as possible. I wouldn't describe Bluedell as a troll! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,354 Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 I have no issues with the easdales, and if you are talking about the thing he done 16years ago, then what is it going to be like for Dave King, what about the guy from SoS, and then there are rumours of stuff PM got up to on european trips. I'm not talking about what the other Easdale got done for 16 years ago, and I don't see the relevance of looking at King or PM when decided whether Easdale is the sort of person we want on the Rangers board. Stick bridge, well I don't know what to believed about him as a major part of this campaign has been talk about hear say, and them how do we know he had a choice, MM never supposedly. So you hope Stockbridge gets re-elected but you don't know what to believe about him? Not sure what you base your opinion on then. If he's a director then he takes full responsibility for all decisions that the board took. If he can't do that then he should resign. Also not sure of the relevance of MM. What has he got to do with whether Stockbridge is doing a good job or not? Why can't the suitability of a director be looked upon on his own merits and without bringing other people into it? It appears that you have based your opinion on the fact that you don't like the requistioners and therefore the current directors must be good. It's possible to vote against Stockbridge and Easdale as well as PM and MM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 Some people want stockbridge out of sheer contraryness but its all of us that need to live with him and the club that suffers. One things for sure no one can make a case for keeping him bassed on performance. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,444 Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 Have a wee listen to this http://news.stv.tv/west-central/257443-rangers-boardroom-battle-comes-to-a-head-at-annual-general-meeting/ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,182 Posted December 19, 2013 Author Share Posted December 19, 2013 Absolutely no disrespect intended but I can't be the only one who thinks Graham Wallace is the double of Fozzie Bear? Just needs a wee hat! Mr Wallace Fozzie Bear 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 yes and buy 5 players a season to sell, bring in bosmans on 30k a week that are quality and win the league. how do we that while cutting costs when our costs are already half theirs. We have to live within our means. If that means we settle for Europa League while our youths develop then so be it. If we just spend, spend, spend we are doomed to make the same mistakes as before. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 Have a wee listen to this http://news.stv.tv/west-central/257443-rangers-boardroom-battle-comes-to-a-head-at-annual-general-meeting/ That is quite embarassing 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 We have to live within our means. If that means we settle for Europa League while our youths develop then so be it. If we just spend, spend, spend we are doomed to make the same mistakes as before. No we need to be run well enough to earn enough to compete. Celtc live within their means. We also have a variety of people wanting to join the board and invest. What we cant do is rot away in second place while the fans and investors are on the outside looking in. Im not asking us to catch man city financially just celtc. Thats the challenge for whatever board emerges. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 No we need to be run well enough to earn enough to compete. Celtc live within their means. We also have a variety of people wanting to join the board and invest. What we cant do is rot away in second place while the fans and investors are on the outside looking in. Im not asking us to catch man city financially just celtc. Thats the challenge for whatever board emerges. We certainly wont get there paying over 1.5 million to various ceos in 18 months. Or 4 million to greens investors on a whim 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,282 Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 While we are waiting ... once all the AGM and board-room issues have subsided, what might be the media's next hyperbole topic? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.