Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Green is away, Stockbridge has no bonus this year. What other board members are earning a wage which concerns you?

 

Stockbridge is still earning a FD's salary, and yet Wallace saw fit to bring in Phillip Nash as a consultant to oversee the cost cutting (which would be within the remit of any competent financial director!) If he was able to do the job for which he is employed, there would be no need for a consultant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stockbridge is still earning a FD's salary, and yet Wallace saw fit to bring in Phillip Nash as a consultant to oversee the cost cutting (which would be within the remit of any competent financial director!) If he was able to do the job for which he is employed, there would be no need for a consultant.

 

How much are we paying Nash? And is the problem just one employee? From the whole board being targeted initially, we are now down to one man. Not bad considering we are paying a near whole squad of imposters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had never heard of the word somesuch until you started using it. It would seem it is in the Urban dictionary but not the English dictionary. I don't mean to criticise your English but the word somesuch just seems so alien to me. Your English is a million light years better than my German, although I am trying to close the gap.:) Your English is possibly better than my English as well and it may be me that is wrong.

Maybe I am just an oldie not up with the modern terms.

 

"Somesuch" ... heard that while studying at Keele University (some aeons ago), used instead of "the like", "suchlike" or "like that". Then again,I'm not shy of finding new words either, such as the "Disfunctional Reality Perception syndrome", which is well attested amongst our "friends" from beyond the Clyde.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's said Richard Hughes has been selling.

 

Mr Zeus Capital dumping the Rangers stock he paid nothing for while it's still worth something? The identity of the buyer should be interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Zeus Capital dumping the Rangers stock he paid nothing for while it's still worth something? The identity of the buyer should be interesting.

 

Easdales? Could be that they already have the voting rights which have been disclosed and therefore no further disclosure is required? Don't know how these things work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Easdales? Could be that they already have the voting rights which have been disclosed and therefore no further disclosure is required? Don't know how these things work.

 

I hope it's not them, but you'd have to guess it'll either be them or Laxey buying the shares. Not sure how the disclosure requirements would work if it's the Easdales and they already had the voting rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's said Richard Hughes has been selling.

 

That's confirmed in the Stock Exchange Announcement on the other thread; zero balance now.

 

Also see this comment in the discussion board.

 

Richard Hughes of Zeus Capital was one of the original Spivs who got his 2.2M shares for £0.01p each. The RNS messages states that his holding is now 0, hence he has sold the lot. We don't know who the buyer is though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.