Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 the easdales are greens patsys. so no Maybe so but are Laxey or Mercantile, Greens patsys? Again both bought shares relativeley cheaply 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Maybe so but are Laxey or Mercantile, Greens patsys? Again both bought shares relativeley cheaply The same Laxey who paid £1 per share? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Maybe so but are Laxey or Mercantile, Greens patsys? Again both bought shares relativeley cheaply and have no say or control. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Totem Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Potential investment!,how do we know what is on offer if they won't at least speak?. So, we aren't turning any (potential) investment away then. If no one speaks, then nothing is offered I assume. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 So, we aren't turning any (potential) investment away then. If no one speaks, then nothing is offered I assume. so if britney spears never says no to my marriage proposal she's accepted? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 and have no say or control. Laxey publicly backed board before AGM, they had there say 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Laxey publicly backed board before AGM, they had there say but what about control. king is having his say with no shares. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 The way some of our support speak about King, is bordering on disgusting. As far as I'm concerned, he has more right than anyone to speak his mind, and keep the pressure up on this joke of a regime. Even if he doesn't invest another dime, he's entitled to his opinion, for as long as he chooses to air it. The fact that what he's saying is also spot on seems to be lost on many of us. This mob want us back in debt, and worse, in debt to them. King is as much as saying this, without actually using the words. Debt is real power, as in all walks of life. He's offering money, they won't even pick up the phone. Shower of utter wanks. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 No one is stopping King buying shares except himself. Would anyone REALLY complain if he spend £2m on shares then only invested £18m into the club??? If he builds up a decent shareholding, it also buys him more credibility - something I think hampered the Requisitioner's attempts. It also allows King to speak as a significant shareholder, rather than an "outsider". I feel that his occasional comments possibly do more harm than good at times. Fans listen to what he says because of his previous investment, but how much of it is 100% accurate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Totem Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 so if britney spears never says no to my marriage proposal she's accepted? I'd say that if she doesn't say no, she has just ignored you as a joker. A bit like the way the present board ignores King's advances, I suppose... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.