Zappa 0 Posted February 17, 2014 Author Share Posted February 17, 2014 ... or maybe the Easdales will finally sell McGills for 80m. Just for the sake of it, that would sure send some Yahoos and their journo fellowship over the edge. They probably have more chance of winning the Euromillions lottery with a bus ticket. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 ... or maybe the Easdales will finally sell McGills for 80m. Just for the sake of it, that would sure send some Yahoos and their journo fellowship over the edge. If you have an asset worth £80m then you don't go mortgaging your properties to the old man Steele at Clifford Finance/Blythswood Motors! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,234 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 They probably have more chance of winning the Euromillions lottery with a bus ticket. Indeed ... yet, who knows? It's much like King's grandstanding and Wallace's silence. For obvious reasons, the glass-is-half-empty brigade is out in full force ... and who can blame them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 ... or maybe the Easdales will finally sell McGills for 80m. Just for the sake of it, that would sure send some Yahoos and their journo fellowship over the edge. Your always good for a laugh db. But seriously do you think they would give it to rangers even of they did somehow sell a break even business for 80 million. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,234 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Actually, I was sarcastic. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I kinda knew but was just checking. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted February 17, 2014 Author Share Posted February 17, 2014 Folks, can we please stop turning almost every thread about DK into yet another debate about his tax cases and the definition of 'convicted criminal'? It is tedious, tiresome and it's also normally off topic, so repeatedly takes threads off on an unnecessary tangent. If you want to discuss whether or not he's a technically a 'convicted criminal', then please pull up one of the old discussions on that matter where the subject has already been flogged to death. Thanks 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 On the OP, instead of back of fag packet calculations, I'd be more likely to be concerned with some actual evidence, which seems in short supply (and, of course, so it should be). I have no idea if or when we might run out of money but I am pretty sure that at the end of the 120 days (around the 19th of April) we will have a plan and an announcement of a share issue to raise somewhere in the region of £15 million, depending on the share price at the time. Wallace said at the AGM ‘However, this funding will only be sought once we have completed a robust business-planning process that will allow us to engage with shareholders and potential investors from the platform of a well thought out strategic plan.’ Unless he comes out with, sorry I made a mistake and we now have an emergency on our hands I would take that over King's interminable ramblings. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted February 17, 2014 Author Share Posted February 17, 2014 A bunch of posts from here which were debating the DK 'convicted criminal' or not subject have been moved to the old thread on that subject which is here - http://www.gersnetonline.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?59652-Dave-King-A-Criminal/page7 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,116 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I can see an order coming from the faceless ones telling the board to sell the stadium in some kind of rent back deal . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.