Zappa 0 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 The Rangers Supporters Association, Assembly and Trust have been contacted by a number of Rangers supporters, who are also current shareholders, indicating they would have provided a secured loan of £1.5m on more favourable terms than the combined Laxey Partners/ Easdale loans. The terms of the Laxey loan in particular seem unduly onerous. We are concerned that not all shareholders are being treated equally. Fans and shareholders both deserve an explanation as to why other shareholders were not approached to provide this loan. The 3 groups call on Rangers, or the NOMAD Daniel Stewart, to clarify the matter. Either in public or through a direct meeting with fan representatives. We have contacted both companies with our concerns. Disappointing that they aren't also asking for the Club to clarify whether the other credit facility for £2.5m has been, is being or is going to be used. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 incredible that we are not using the best terms possible just t benefit certain spivs. wallace must be sacked immediately. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Norman Crighton (the Arab on the board) was placed on the board at Laxey's insistance as he himself admitted, he chairs the laughably named "Investment Committee", he appears to be serving his masters Laxey at the expense of everyone else when he has a fiduciary duty to all shareholders. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 I posted a few days ago asking where this requirement for a loan left Wallace. "The Rangers Supporters Association, Assembly and Trust have been contacted by a number of Rangers supporters, who are also current shareholders, indicating they would have provided a secured loan of £1.5m on more favourable terms than the combined Laxey Partners/ Easdale loans." If this statement if true (and I have no reason to believe its not) Wallace has to go and go now if he has any self respect, otherwise he will be seen as just another spiv with his head in the trough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 I posted a few days ago asking where this requirement for a loan left Wallace. "The Rangers Supporters Association, Assembly and Trust have been contacted by a number of Rangers supporters, who are also current shareholders, indicating they would have provided a secured loan of £1.5m on more favourable terms than the combined Laxey Partners/ Easdale loans." If this statement if true (and I have no reason to believe its not) Wallace has to go and go now if he has any self respect, otherwise he will be seen as just another spiv with his head in the trough. It appears Wallace is happy enough to lend his name to anything, only a matter of time before he gets his £300k payoff. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 I think that's a good statement that leaves the Board with some questions to be answered, not that they will. Ready to Listen only applies sometimes, I'll bet. But well done RST/A/A. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hildy 0 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Good statement. Perhaps the fan groups should give regular updates on all communications with Rangers regarding this latest debacle. The pressure has to go on and stay on. We need a published time and date for a meeting with the CEO or other relevant party, and it needs to be soon. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 That's a good statement. I would have considered copying in AIM while I was at it. Time to fight back using the same tactics. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Did anyone honestly think that Wallace was anything more than a puppet for his masters? If they sack him, he will only get replaced with some other muppet, who does what he's told. He can stick his 120 day grace period up his arse as far as I'm concerned. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWee BlueDevil 0 Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 Disappointing that they aren't also asking for the Club to clarify whether the other credit facility for £2.5m has been, is being or is going to be used. Maybe some credit where it's due for highlighting this before the nitpicking. Bottom line is the fans/fans groups influence/wishes amount to zero with this board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.