ian1964 10,417 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 I don't think for one minute that that this board will roll over for King, unless he buys them out!,they will cling on for top dollar 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 It's the only deal we know all about. Are the other ones like the commercial deal with sports direct better. Seems highly unlikely. It's basically a 100 percent fail rate for the board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 It's the only deal we know all about. Are the other ones like the commercial deal with sports direct better. Seems highly unlikely. It's basically a 100 percent fail rate for the board. 49% of merchandise profits going back to Sports Direct from the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 49% of merchandise profits going back to Sports Direct from the club. A very similar deal to the **** loan in many ways. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,249 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 However, there has been more than one error from the latest board (Irvine was here too long, Daniel Stewart don't convince, some board members seem to lack good PR, fan interaction is zero) so there's a big difference between being negative for the sake of it and asking valid questions of people that represent others whose intentions we still don't know enough about. That's not hyperbole - that's fact. The loan deal stuff has been taken out of proportion, as it is used to endlessly club the board without knowing the whys of it. You can hardly argue pro-Irvine, yet, I for one reckon that you simply cannot stop contracts and engagements at once, at least not without costs. So I reckon it took them a while to reach an agreement with Media House and TI. Can't say too much about Daniel Stewart, as I am not a business guru. "Fan interaction is zero"? It was "zero" under Murray and Bain, whereas Wallace and Co. have spoken various times to the supporters groups since he took up his role. Now, supporters - obviously - always want to hear every detail and every scrap of info that is out there, but no business this side of Saturn's rings will give a 100% round-up to the public. And that holds true for King as well. There are limits and usually issues have to and will be addressed with the annual accounts. We all want to know the board's / club's strategic plans for the future, but it is unlikely that we get them in a detail we want. Maybe people should come to terms with that, as this is the same all over the world, not just with Rangers FC. We should get answers to realistic questions from the board, and they obviously have obligations to the stock market too. What quite a few people amongst the support look for goes way beyond that though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,147 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 cant see a season ticket standoff benefiting anyone 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 I fear Jackson is premature in declaring check mate, those controlling us are as they have already demonstrated on numerous occasions both astute and devious and show scant regard for the rules. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.