barca72 440 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 If we are to believe Richard Wilson's article then King has the board dead to rights. They lied again. I agree that no matter what else they do, they must at least release the review results, and it better be convincing one way or another. http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/26959101 From para. 5 ... "... Dave King, who wants to invest in the club, the Ibrox board had agreed to complete the business review being undertaken by chief executive Graham Wallace before the season ticket renewal process. King will consider the launch as a breach of that agreement and is likely to respond firmly." 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 After a few readings, that's a pretty unprofessional press release. How they will be attempting to prepare a legal case against a South African citizen making a statement from South Africa is totally beyond me. Between the lines, I think their cage is rattled. But beware when rats are cornered. This might become very messy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted April 11, 2014 Author Share Posted April 11, 2014 After a few readings, that's a pretty unprofessional press release. Very very unprofessional indeed. I think Somers and Toxic Jack might have had a few sherries before they put their heads together and came up with that drivel. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 RFFF to fund a defence against any legal action against King? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 RFFF to fund a defence against any legal action against King? There won't be any action. Mark my words. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted April 11, 2014 Author Share Posted April 11, 2014 RFFF to fund a defence against any legal action against King? Cue RFFF Civil War Part II and a badly worded statement from Augusta! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wasp 0 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Totally, Zap - that bit about not wanting to invest is feeble manipulation of what he said, which is that he'd be happy if others ponied up the dosh so he didn't have to. I dunno if I'm totally convinced by King but I absolutely know how I feel about the board. Give the board the 120 days they asked forAndy, then maybe even I will join you in crucifying them.Until then let's just wait and hope. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 RFFF to fund a defence against any legal action against King? Those who voted yes must resign and NARSA MUST jump in with both feet. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wasp 0 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Those who voted yes must resign and NARSA MUST jump in with both feet. So king dosen't have the money to defend himself? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 So king dosen't have the money to defend himself? Apparently he can only be bothered defending himself against nation states. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.