Zappa 0 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Easdale's brief at L&M will probably be using "The Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Act 2012" section 6 again under the claim that the petition purposely sent thousands of emails with the intention of causing his client 'alarm' and that his client has indeed been caused great 'alarm'. Seriously.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Easdale's brief at L&M will probably be using "The Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Act 2012" section 6 again under the claim that the petition purposely sent thousands of emails with the intention of causing his client 'alarm' and that his client has indeed been caused great 'alarm'. Seriously.... One could argue that the presence of Mr.Easdale and other board members at football matches causes 'alarm' within the support in general. So much so that ST numbers have fallen dramatically. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 There's a huge difference. If I generate an email or send a letter then I send it. If sign an on-line petition and have no idea that it generates an email then who are the senders? How can I send something that I know nothing about? Well, you would clearly be the sender. Whether you knew you were sending or not is not the issue - after all ignorance is no defence in law - the fact is that you still sent the e-mail by signing the petition.. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Sons of Struth @SonsofStruth 4m Sherif officers looking for me. Wonder who I've upset today. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,354 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Well, you would clearly be the sender. Whether you knew you were sending or not is not the issue - after all ignorance is no defence in law - the fact is that you still sent the e-mail by signing the petition.. That's BS. So if someone sets a bomb in your house which will only go off if you switch on your bathroom light then when you switch it on then it's your fault. You triggered the bomb and ignorance is no defence? Yeah, right. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted May 21, 2014 Author Share Posted May 21, 2014 If that's the case then I think it's a really stupid thing to do; a petition is one thing, deliberately spamming email is just harassment and takes away from the petition. Have you signed it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted May 21, 2014 Author Share Posted May 21, 2014 So I gather now - and, btw, my enqiry wasn't one of reproach, but rather to see if we could streamline the process if required. Personally, I think you did Mr Easedale a service. The man plays a key role in the management of the club and I would have thought that he'd be keen to know the extent of fan feeling on the issue. Now he does No problem. I agree with you, SOS are only making him aware of the strength of feeling amongst the fans. He should be thankful for the information. Notice that the usual suspects are more annoyed about Easedale & Wallace getting emails than the prospect of losing MP and possibly Ibrox. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,282 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Have you signed it? Maybe 378 Yahoos have? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted May 21, 2014 Author Share Posted May 21, 2014 @SonsofStruth: Sheriff officers have been and I found out it's the same people I upset yesterday. Ah well toddle pip. You guys know the drill 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 (edited) This is great news! No doubt on the back of this, the continual recorded messages I have received for several years now about claiming PPI compensation will cease, since they will be considered as harrassment. No doubt the glaikit wee scrotes who stand at my door, thump my wall with the flat of their hand and go 'aye, ye need cavitty insewlachin, big man' will sod off since they, too, can be considered harrassment. No doubt the bales of guff which comes through my door exhorting me to take out a credit card will cease too, as they most certainly constitute harrassment on both environmental and political grounds. Really, 'I don't like this' is about the feeblest excuse for legal action ever. There's plenty of things I don't like but I can't always go crying to the lawyer's office. Grow up, Easdale. Edited February 23, 2017 by andy steel 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.