Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

The request revealed that Philip Nash receives almost £200,000 per year, the salary paid to his predecessor, Brian Stockbridge, a full-time employee.

But Nash's agreement was for up to 16 days per month, at a daily rate of £1,000, plus expenses.

 

They miss the point the maximum 16 days per month isn't actually a maximum as it is accompanied by the following caveat:

 

or as required by the Club and RIFC
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's already above my head. I take it another waste of vital resources? Nash hasn't earned it and is just another splv?

 

Personally I think he may well be the only one there worth the money.

 

I don't think it's that extreme but I certainly question the wisdom of paying for both Nash and Stockbridge for a period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not gonna get my hopes up after so many false dawns, but it might be an interesting development. Fingers crossed!

 

This in spades. At best I'm looking at tonight's stuff as the next phase of the war on corporate rapists

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.