BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Exactly, so when journos are citing a 10% rule that isn't there in the SFA Handbook, it begs the question, have the rules just recently been changed for the release of the 2014/15 SFA Handbook? No, the same rule has applied since the Special Resolution Passed On 7th June 2011. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 The 2011 version has the same clause. Sorry didn't see that before I posted. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Sorry didn't see that before I posted. Yours was sexed up though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Keep up FFS! Dave King = Bad Mike Ashley = Good 4 legs good 2 legs bad 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 4, 2014 Author Share Posted September 4, 2014 I'm not saying for one minute that I agree with this but I really do wish King would come out with a statement or something and tell us his plans if he has any I'd wager that it's a far more difficult & complex situation for Dave King than any of us appreciate mate, especially if he doesn't know the full extent of the financial wreckage that's been done since Green & co's takeover up until now, the extent of onerous contracts and everything else that we're currently seeing unfolding. As we've just witnessed with the news of the Ashley/Ibrox naming rights problem and the Rangers Retail/Sports Direct problem with £2.7m due to us, but supposedly tied up and unavailable for working capital, there's a situation where it seems that only a very select group of people know what skeletons are hiding in cupboards. How do you make plans if you're not 100% sure what's actually going on? Then there's the issue of some fans wanting less talk & more action from guys like Dave King and when he releases statements they criticise him for releasing too many statements. Personally, I'd be happy for him just to be going about his business quietly and sorting out a controlling stake whenever he feels the time is right, then once he's in there, start putting plans on the table and get the mess sorted out ASAP. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 4, 2014 Author Share Posted September 4, 2014 No, the same rule has applied since the Special Resolution Passed On 7th June 2011. What prompted the 'Special Resolution'? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 4, 2014 Author Share Posted September 4, 2014 4 legs good2 legs bad Truffle sniffing pig snouts = good Bluenoses who care about Rangers = bad 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,612 Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 (edited) I'm not saying for one minute that I agree with this but I really do wish King would come out with a statement or something and tell us his plans if he has any I think you have to presume he has no interest in taking over Rangers. Edited September 4, 2014 by RANGERRAB 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 I think you have to presume he has no interest in taking over Rangers. You're nothing if not predictable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Yours was sexed up though. Just copied and pasted from the front of the Rule Book, thanks. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.