North Rd 0 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Mike Ashley to up his stake in Rangers to 9.9% through the current share issue. Source SSN” Sources close to Mike Ashley say there are no immediate plans to invoke the naming rights at Ibrox stadium #Rangers @charlesp_sky: It's understood Ashley views his interests in Rangers as purely strong commercial ones which he intends to protect 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 No surprise there if it happens. He'll be making an absolute fortune from the Rangers Retail/Sports Direct deal which Green & co gave him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 I dont know why anyone blames Ashley for doing what any business man would do , and make serious money out of any circumstance . Its not his fault CG was an arse of a man , neither was it our fault that we got lumbered with him , but we need to deal with whats in front of us and deal with the past at a later date. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,231 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 ... and while hardly incouraging news on one hand, it might be good (to a degree) on the other. For I doubt he would want to see his investment go to the wall. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Mike Ashley to up his stake in Rangers to 9.9% through the current share issue. Source SSN” Sources close to Mike Ashley say there are no immediate plans to invoke the naming rights at Ibrox stadium #Rangers @charlesp_sky: It's understood Ashley views his interests in Rangers as purely strong commercial ones which he intends to protect A man with a real vision for our future. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 ... and while hardly incouraging news on one hand, it might be good (to a degree) on the other. For I doubt he would want to see his investment go to the wall. We have been caught out by that logic a few times before. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 He must be buying serious amounts of shares then , according to the share information section , he currently owns 3,000,000 or 4.56% , goin up to 9% will be a seriouss jump. Shareholder No of Ordinary Shares held % of issued share capital Laxey Partners Ltd 8,292,957 12.6% Artemis Investment Management LLP 5,479,000 8.33% River and Mercantile Asset Management LLP 4,795,500 7.29% Hargreave Hale Limited 4,601,688 6.99% Blue Pitch Holding* 4,000,000 6.08% Miton Capital Partners 3,143,857 4.78% Mike Ashley 3,000,000 4.56% Alexander Easdale* 2,942,957 4.47% Margarita Funds Holding Trust* 2,600,000 3.95% 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 I dont know why anyone blames Ashley for doing what any business man would do , and make serious money out of any circumstance . Its not his fault CG was an arse of a man , neither was it our fault that we got lumbered with him , but we need to deal with whats in front of us and deal with the past at a later date. I'm all for dealing in the here and now rbr, so how about we start by finding out why the Club supposedly can't get access to several million pounds owed to it by Rangers Retail Ltd? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 I dont know why anyone blames Ashley for doing what any business man would do , and make serious money out of any circumstance . Its not his fault CG was an arse of a man , neither was it our fault that we got lumbered with him , but we need to deal with whats in front of us and deal with the past at a later date. He is here just to milk what money he can from one sided commercial contracts that work against the club. He has no interest in our long term development aside from furthering his own wealth. He is as toxic as they come and serves absolutely no benefit to us whatsoever. I don't really see the difference here in your logic. Green came to make a quick buck and Ashley is doing the same. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 ... and while hardly incouraging news on one hand, it might be good (to a degree) on the other. For I doubt he would want to see his investment go to the wall. Fucking hell, never heard that said in the last few years. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.