Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

i have answered that several times.

 

shareholders will have to vote. knowing a no vote will mean admin.

 

That is not a proper answer as it suggests that those who have control have no other contingencies. Do you seriously believe that they have planned all this just to meekly give in at the first hint of trouble?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not a proper answer as it suggests that those who have control have no other contingencies. Do you seriously believe that they have planned all this just to meekly give in at the first hint of trouble?

 

They have called an eGM to stop it. That's hardly meek.

 

Who knows where else they have planned lots I am sure.

 

They may well force admin out of spite.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have called an eGM to stop it. That's hardly meek.

 

Who knows where else they have planned lots I am sure.

 

They may well force admin out of spite.

 

So why are you saying that the shareholders would need to vote through a resolution which would be required to issue new shares?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So why are you saying that the shareholders would need to vote through a resolution which would be required to issue new shares?

 

Because if the board accept this loan that's what will happen.

 

Or the loan will have to be repaid.

 

Or we go bust owing kingco a lot of money.

 

You can of course structure the loan to suit. Just an example but you could say it carries a 10 percent premium if not repaid in shares.

 

All assuming the board approve the loan. Which is also only the rumoured structure in fairness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because if the board accept this loan that's what will happen.

 

Or the loan will have to be repaid.

 

Or we go bust owing kingco a lot of money.

 

You can of course structure the loan to suit. Just an example but you could say it carries a 10 percent premium if not repaid in shares.

 

All assuming the board approve the loan. Which is also only the rumoured structure in fairness.

 

That's just your pro-King spin. It is as tedious as the shite pumped out by Jack via McLaughlin, Lamont and McMurdo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.