the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 I would take any info with a large pinch of salt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Regarding Keith Jackson saying "if Wallace, Nash and Crighton remain in agreement then this package will receive boardroom support": I can't really comprehend why Laxey's representative Norman Crighton would vote in favour of King & co's offer because Laxey have invested millions in buying 13.3 million shares and won't be keen to see that shareholding massively diluted. Going by their previous actions - including their participation in the recent Open Offer - it would seem far more likely that Laxey would want to increase their shareholding in a further share issue as opposed to see it diluted. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 @JimWhite: Hearing tonight Dave King remains optimistic his consortium's bailout package will be accepted by Rangers Board. Talks continue. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 (edited) Regarding Keith Jackson saying "if Wallace, Nash and Crighton remain in agreement then this package will receive boardroom support": I can't really comprehend why Laxey's representative Norman Crighton would vote in favour of King & co's offer because Laxey have invested millions in buying 13.3 million shares and won't be keen to see that shareholding massively diluted. Going by their previous actions - including their participation in the recent Open Offer - it would seem far more likely that Laxey would want to increase their shareholding in a further share issue as opposed to see it diluted. Struck me as rather strange too, Zappa. It should be pointed out that Laxey were also reported to be on board a year ago. Look how that turned out for King and company. Edited October 20, 2014 by Rangersitis 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Regarding Keith Jackson saying "if Wallace, Nash and Crighton remain in agreement then this package will receive boardroom support": I can't really comprehend why Laxey's representative Norman Crighton would vote in favour of King & co's offer because Laxey have invested millions in buying 13.3 million shares and won't be keen to see that shareholding massively diluted. Going by their previous actions - including their participation in the recent Open Offer - it would seem far more likely that Laxey would want to increase their shareholding in a further share issue as opposed to see it diluted. They will want the people who presided over 20k non renewals gone 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Stv news say that more talks took place today and king goes home on Thursday 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Struck me as rather strange too, Zappa. It should be pointed out that Laxey were also reported to be on board a year ago. Look how that turned out for King and company. If referring to the letter of requisition (1/8/13) and what led up to the AGM in December of the same year, DK wasn't directly involved with the parties involved. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 If referring to the letter of requisition (1/8/13) and what led up to the AGM in December of the same year, DK wasn't directly involved with the parties involved. His name didn't appear on the voting papers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 They will want the people who presided over 20k non renewals gone Wasn't that Wallace, Nash and Crighton? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 His name didn't appear on the voting papers. Whilst he was obviously more sympathetic to the requisitioners proposals, he wasn't really involved. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.