der Berliner 3,231 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 the slimy k.unt is going to get off with all this, isn't he ??!! Unlikely, and you'd like to know whether he's been fined for not attending previous hearings. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Think he would actually pay a fine? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charltonman 19 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 If he's not a guest of her majesty just now , will BH be inviting him to the dinner ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
onevision 1,441 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 If you could find a goalkeeper and add him to the "squad" above. Id be confident they could beat Rangers Fixed........ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Unfortunatley I'm not overly confident that he will get banged away for all of this. Got a horrible feeling that he may wriggle out of this yet. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Whyte at court earlier... should be jailed for contempt for turning up looking like that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
quattro 0 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Apparently the adjournment is to allow the completion of inquiries, as to the knowledge of Ticketus and at least two others with regard to the contracts and agreements with Whyte in this action. Some think the Crown Office in Scotland were precipitous in the issuing of warrants, whilst not being in possession of all the evidence, which the English court has adjourned to be presented with. The smart money is on Ticketus's action being thrown out, not without further ramifications for some involved parties it must be said. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Apparently the adjournment is to allow the completion of inquiries, as to the knowledge of Ticketus and at least two others with regard to the contracts and agreements with Whyte in this action.Some think the Crown Office in Scotland were precipitous in the issuing of warrants, whilst not being in possession of all the evidence, which the English court has adjourned to be presented with. The smart money is on Ticketus's action being thrown out, not without further ramifications for some involved parties it must be said.[/Q Isn't this case based on the claim that Whyte did't disclose that he had been disqualified from acting as a company director for a period, and had therefore misled them when he applied for the funding? Basically he had committed a fraud on them. It's about how he got the funds not what he did with them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Apparently the adjournment is to allow the completion of inquiries, as to the knowledge of Ticketus and at least two others with regard to the contracts and agreements with Whyte in this action.Some think the Crown Office in Scotland were precipitous in the issuing of warrants, whilst not being in possession of all the evidence, which the English court has adjourned to be presented with. The smart money is on Ticketus's action being thrown out, not without further ramifications for some involved parties it must be said. The case in England is a civil case, the case in Scotland is a criminal case. You simply don't hold up criminal proceedings for the conclusion of a civil case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
quattro 0 Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 The problem for the Scottish criminal action is that a Law Lord has already ruled that Ticketus under Scots Law bought no tickets, how the PF's office get around that one is something of wonderment, whereas the civil action will be as usual on probability which will also be a problem for Ticketus I.E what led them to believe that the tickets were Whyte's to sell, taking into consideration that they had previously done business with SDM's regime. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.