Jump to content

 

 

Does anyone still care to disagree with Donald Findlay?


Recommended Posts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2816759/Donald-Findlay-says-Rangers-new-entity-establish-s-history-tradition.html

 

What we see now is not Rangers. It's a fucking monstrosity and I'm close to giving up.

 

Bloody hell SBS, is your new avatar "the chosen one" a couple of months after being appointed Rangers new manager?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone still care to disagree with Donald Findlay?

 

Suum cuique, but I for one think that this is playing nicely into the hands of the Hooped Horrors and their fellowship. But once people start repeating this rubbish often enough, it may get a certain momentum. Not surprised by who whipped up this topic again, though. Two-and-a-half months after Findlay's musings.

 

Rangers FC is more than Whyte and what followed ever after up till now. Rangers is not solely made up of the squad that manages to dishonour Ibrox' turf these days. No-one can say what Rangers will look like in 4 or 10 years time. They will not look like the Rangers of the 90s, nor like the Rangers of the 80s, or the 60s. We've seen good times and bad times and hardly ever had events at boardroom level and ownership dictated what sort of "entity" the club was, or what history was created. Dictated the way people think about the club, that is. The way they "feel" for Rangers FC. You can clearly see why people would bring this up these days though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suum cuique, but I for one think that this is playing nicely into the hands of the Hooped Horrors and their fellowship. But once people start repeating this rubbish often enough, it may get a certain momentum. Not surprised by who whipped up this topic again, though. Two-and-a-half months after Findlay's musings.

 

Rangers FC is more than Whyte and what followed ever after up till now. Rangers is not solely made up of the squad that manages to dishonour Ibrox' turf these days. No-one can say what Rangers will look like in 4 or 10 years time. They will not look like the Rangers of the 90s, nor like the Rangers of the 80s, or the 60s. We've seen good times and bad times and hardly ever had events at boardroom level and ownership dictated what sort of "entity" the club was, or what history was created. Dictated the way people think about the club, that is. The way they "feel" for Rangers FC. You can clearly see why people would bring this up these days though.

 

Why do your thoughts invariably revolve around Celtic and their support, with the views of Rangers fans relegated to the runner-up position?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do your thoughts invariably revolve around Celtic and their support, with the views of Rangers fans relegated to the runner-up position?

 

Many are the same, it's the 'Cabal Blame Game', where they have to find someone other than the executive board to blame for the state of the club.

 

It's the SFA, SPFL, the meeja, Fullerton, LBG, HMRC, Desmond, King, UoF, SoS.................etc, etc.

 

You'll note that the other side of this game for the serial players is to back every money grabbing sp.iv that passes through Ibox.

 

 

It can be down to 'mind-control' (within groupthink), downright stupidity, something darker or a combination.

Edited by buster.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many are the same, it's the 'Cabal Blame Game', where they have to find someone other than the executive board to blame for the state of the club.

 

It's the SFA, SPFL, the meeja, Fullerton, LBG, HMRC, Desmond, King, UoF, SoS.................etc, etc.

 

You'll note that the other side of this game for the serial players is to back every money grabbing sp.iv that passes through Ibox.

 

 

It can be down to 'mind-control' (within groupthink), downright stupidity, something darker or a combination.

 

It screams at you off the page.

 

There is culpability elsewhere, but it is extremely limited, and anyone focusing on it, or repeatedly attempting to get others to do likewise, needs a watching.

Edited by Rangersitis
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.