trublusince1982 243 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 (edited) do the board get charged by the word on our official website? couldn't make the statement any shorter if you tried. Unless you went with "fucked". Edited December 24, 2014 by trublusince1982 clarity 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Does he have any children or siblings? They could buy us with his money being gifted to them or in a trust or whatever - got to be loads of ways round it if he wants to. every time the words "Ashley + Wants" are uttered every Rangers fan should involuntarily shudder. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Rarely is there good news where Rangers is concerned, but this resembles something close to it. Of course Ashley will have to respond now, so bad news probably isn't too far away. Once he decides what is best for Sports Direct, we'll hear what happens next. I agree with you H, up to the point you thanked the SFA, Those corrupt fockers never have and never will do anything with the best interest of Rangers in mind. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,286 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 (edited) BTW, just seen on FF ... on monday two buys of 1m shares were bought at 11-55am. Edited December 24, 2014 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 It's a straight choice as far as I can see. Accept King's investment or a series of loans from Ashley Or declare bankruptcy 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Our existing shareholders have a choice between: 1: Stumping up more cash in a new share issue (can't see that happening). 2: Yet more Ashley loans secured on whatever assets he decides to ask for. 3: Selling out to Dave King for much less than they've been willing to contemplate thus far, or 4: Accepting his offer of a multi million £ investment, thereby diluting their holdings. This could either be achieved by selling their rights in a new issue, or reversing the AGM decision on resolution 9. I'd prefer to see #3 or #4, but #2 looks favourite to me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Or declare bankruptcy I would think it impossible to get a,judge to declare you insolvent with 3 million debt and 16 million investment on the table. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 imagine an innocent child looking up at you with innocent eyes saying i had no other option! honest i tried! its this or you would die! remember they think we are all dumb! I'm not saying that he wouldn't try it, but those wee innocents are growing up faster than ever before. Chip, chip, chip. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Or declare bankruptcy I don't see what GreenCo could hope to achieve by that. Ashley would be the major creditor and the other shareholders would get less than even a fire sale to Dave King would generate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Douglas Fraser @BBCDouglasF 31m31 minutes ago SFA rejects Mike Ashley bid to raise #Rangers stake from 9% to 30%. My take on #rfc cash crisis + SFA's dilemma: http://bbc.in/13VULYK 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.