simplythebest 0 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Have Dave King or any of the new Board actually claimed that they have "incriminating evidence" about Sandy Easdale or are you just making things up and essentially shit-stirring?No, it's been suggested they do on here as a suggestion for Sandy Easdale walking away. Personally I'd rather take it at their word that an amicable parting of the ways has been reached and move on 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSolace 0 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Anyone that had dealings with these two individuals would want them nowhere nrar Ibrox .... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Don't follow? As Colin Says at post 19. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 No, it's been suggested they do on here as a suggestion for Sandy Easdale walking away. Personally I'd rather take it at their word that an amicable parting of the ways has been reached and move on Which still suggests nothing about good or bad intentions. What option did he have ? He would have been delaying the inevitable... But you dress it up as him not having bad intentions.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Which still suggests nothing about good or bad intentions. What option did he have ? He would have been delaying the inevitable... But you dress it up as him not having bad intentions.... The statement backed up that he hasn't had a salary from us and he's taken a sensible exit route while Llambias and Leach still seem to went to drag everything out and cost the club more money 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 No, it's been suggested they do on here as a suggestion for Sandy Easdale walking away. Both of the Easdales' positions were untenable, it's that simple. They were in bed with the enemy as far as most Rangers fans were (and are) concerned and they've been directly involved in voting through some absolutely despicable boardroom decisions which weren't in the best interests of the company or the Club. Then there's their use not only of Jack Irvine, but of arseholes from Pacific Quay CSC and lawyers they instructed to threaten and take legal action against Rangers fans, websites and forums. Your sympathies are beyond comprehension yet again and completely misplaced. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,356 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Think he got a raw deal tbh, out of his depth but not badly intended You really don't know anything about him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,186 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 (edited) You really don't know anything about him. Poor Sandy Easdale - so misunderstood. Chris Graham - A rat and wanker. [/stb_logic] Edited March 11, 2015 by Frankie 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
limeburner 0 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 The Easedales tried to do it their way, they failed miserably. Any defence of them now is beyond understanding. They would probably admit this themselves,they are a footnote in our history,best forgotten. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,060 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Think he got a raw deal tbh, out of his depth but not badly intended It's pretty f*&king clear who got the raw deal in the Easdales plan to ingratiate and attempt to legitimise themselves in Scottish society. They allowed themselves to be taken in, used by and eventually f*&ked over firstly by the man you yourself anointed saviour of Rangers and again by Ashley and all the time to the detriment of Rangers, but the one that really f*&ked them over is their "family spokesman" who must be absolutely pissing himself that he's found such a cash cow in Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Dumber. Claiming they're not badly intended is a bit like claiming Harold Shipman always put his patients welfare first. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.