ian1964 10,720 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 THE recruitment of Mark Warburton as Rangers’ new manager was handled by directors Paul Murray and John Gilligan and not chairman Dave King, it has emerged. Warburton has admitted he is yet to meet King, the South African-based Scot who won control of the club in March. The 52-year-old former Brentford manager was interviewed by Murray and Gilligan before his appointment as Stuart McCall’s successor. Gilligan said: “In this instance Paul and I were charged with the task of going and recruiting the manager and then reporting back to the board and explaining why we thought the choice was right and then the board then gave their opinion. Dave, contrary to what a lot of people might think, was quite comfortable with that. He delegated that job and that’s the way a board should operate. We recommended and then the board took the recommendation and decided yes. “This is how I worked at Tennent’s when I was MD of a £150 million business. People come with recommendations, you have a board meeting and OK it. That’s exactly what happens.” Warburton said of King: “We haven’t met as yet. I am sure he’s a very busy man and he’s chairman of the football club, so whenever the schedule allows I look forward to that [meeting him].” Rangers, meanwhile, were yesterday linked with a move for central midfielder John Eustace who played for Derby County last season but is now a free agent. Eustace, 35, had a spell on loan at Dundee United in season 1998-99 while at Coventry City. The experienced Eustace also played for Watford for several seasons while Warburton was a coach at Vicarage Road. http://www.scotsman.com/sport/football/spfl-lower-divisions/rangers-warburton-appointed-without-meeting-king-1-3808193 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,720 Posted June 21, 2015 Author Share Posted June 21, 2015 Rangers duo Murray and Warburton admit there will be NO big-name signings RANGERS fans have been told the days of big-name glamour signings such as Paul Gascoigne and Brian Laudrup will not be coming back. Previous owner Sir David Murray loved a big-name signing, especially if it helped boost the sale of Ibrox season tickets. But that was then, this is now and the economics of the former Light Blues chairman belong to a far off era, as his namesake emphasised. Current director Paul Murray outlined the philosophy that will rule on signing the new players manager Mark Warburton desperately needs. “I don’t think the idea of making a marquee signing just for the sake of it is always a good idea,” said Murray. “But if a player becomes available that the manager thinks can add some value to the club, we will obviously look at it. “We’re not going to sign Ronaldo or Messi any time soon, but there are obviously a good number of players that have been offered to us and we’re having initial discussions with some of them. “Certain positions will be priorities and we need to deal with them quickly. You can’t guarantee you will get a transfer target in time, so it’s going to be a lot of hard work over the next few weeks.” New Ibrox boss Warburton, linked with a move for 35-year-old former Derby midfielder John Eustace and close to signing Wigan defender Rob Kiernan, has admitted he likes to work with a tight, lean squad, but Murray added: “It’s a balance between doing that and being able to cope with injuries and suspensions by having cover in certain positions. “There is no magic number as such. We have lost 10 players but that’s not to say we need to replace them with another 10.” http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/585889/Rangers-No-Money-For-Big-Transfer-Targets-Like-Laudrup-Gascoigne 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 I don't see what the story is on this. King does not need to hold everybody's hand when doing their job. A non story for me. There are many detractors trying to throw a spanner in the works. Phil can't decide on his name is saying King had a meeting with Ashely to sell his shares to him because he can't finance the club. I am sure there will be many more stories emerging from the dark side. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,720 Posted June 21, 2015 Author Share Posted June 21, 2015 I don't see what the story is on this. King does not need to hold everybody's hand when doing their job. A non story for me. There are many detractors trying to throw a spanner in the works. Phil can't decide on his name is saying King had a meeting with Ashely to sell his shares to him because he can't finance the club. I am sure there will be many more stories emerging from the dark side. All this gives me a certain feel good feeling,we seem to be just going about our business and it is very unsettling for all the Rangers haters. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BalooBear 7 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 All this gives me a certain feel good feeling,we seem to be just going about our business and it is very unsettling for all the Rangers haters. The media are clutching at straws trying to get any type of story as the club is conducting itself in a professional manner. Just on a side note could you imagine the last board tasking two directors to acquire a management team , once they had done what Mike Ashley wanted they would have given themselves a couple of hundred thousand in bonuses for doing their jobs. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
limeburner 0 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Dont see what the problem is here. If you cant trust your fellow board members to carry out a task then they should not be there. Im sure DK was kept informed during the process. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Clutching at straws. They haven't a clue what is going on. One of the benefits of the new Manager, no pals in the Scottish media. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 King stated from the start that a committee had been selected to identify the best candidate. Total non issue. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 I don't see what the story is on this. King does not need to hold everybody's hand when doing their job. A non story for me. There are many detractors trying to throw a spanner in the works. Phil can't decide on his name is saying King had a meeting with Ashely to sell his shares to him because he can't finance the club. I am sure there will be many more stories emerging from the dark side. Half=baked article Pete. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,716 Posted June 21, 2015 Share Posted June 21, 2015 Dunno, but some of the journos actually believe that we are back in the Murray days with King. He is a (as in ONE) major shareholder, probably the richest of the lot. He sure has a great say in the direction we are taking. But he remains just a (as in ONE) director of the club. Chairman he might be, king he is not. And as such, not everything willl go over his table. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.