jhunter 0 Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 imagine those dolls were black and the word hun replaced with the n word or darkie would that be inappropriate and hugely disappointing? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,255 Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 (edited) The whole issue of these banners & dolls needs to be dealt with by the SFA/SPFL as well as Plod Scotland. It is apparent that there is a problem with the GB at the San Giro that Liewell either cannot or will not deal with. It therefore needs to be deal with by the relevant authorities. Questions need to be asked how they got these dolls & banners into the stadium in the first place. No way were they taken over turnstiles on matchday. From what I've been told the GB have storage facilties within the San Giro which they can access outwith matchdays. Therefore on matchdays they can easily access these banners, dolls etc. And Liewell should be charged with bringing the game into disrepute if that is the case. Edited September 18, 2016 by RANGERRAB 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 Meanwhile witnesses describe offensive and sectarian chanting from both sets of fans including IRA songs and the notorious Billy Boys. Notorious Billy Boys and some IRA songs, how can you compare when you read media reports? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 The whole issue of these banners & dolls needs to be dealt with by the SFA/SPFL as well as Plod Scotland. It is apparent that there is a problem with the GB at the San Giro that Liewell either cannot or will not deal with. It therefore needs to be deal with by the relevant authorities. Questions need to be asked how they got these dolls & banners into the stadium in the first place. No way were they taken over turnstiles on matchday. From what I've been told the GB have storage facilties within the San Giro which they can access outwith matchdays. Therefore on matchdays they can easily access these banners, dolls etc. And Liewell should be charged with bringing the game into disrepute if that is the case. No...I heard he has the power to deal with it 'privately' within...and he has that position to do just that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 (edited) If the law created by the government is broken why would the government not send in appropriate personnel to deal with the perpetrators? The government itself has reported that this behaviour - "could have led to public disorder", and indeed was deemed "inappropriate behaviour". In what other field have the government not accepted responsibility and acted and brought the guilty to a court of law, e.g., the stock exchange, BBC sexual deviants' behaviour etc., a guy singing TBB? What gives a company the right to deal with a situation, using their own devices, where a law has been clearly broken? Why are C1888c allowed to keep the country waiting to see how they will deal with a law being broken when every other company is subject to the strictions of the forces of law? Where is order and parity shown by these actions? Over to you fat paper-pusher !! Edited September 18, 2016 by barca72 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.