der Berliner 3,240 Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 (edited) Are the BBC Scotland team in a race with the Yahoos to see who can stoop lower? Edited September 21, 2016 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,410 Posted September 21, 2016 Author Share Posted September 21, 2016 Are the BBC Scotland team in a race with the Yahoos to see who can stoop lower? Both are the same! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuGers 477 Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 The headline from the BBC 'Arrest over Rangers fans 'hanging' effigies at Celtic game' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-37430643 Unbelievable 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,240 Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 Wonder if the club can hunt them for defamation and bring our name into disrepute? What else will these trolls keep from going on with this? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 5,153 Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 Wow. They do not mind being liars just to blacken our name. Edit - just realised that their get-out is that it can be read in two ways. Scummy bastards. Only one way to read that. The simple way. For another valid interpretation they would have needed a bunch of these apostrophe gizmos. Looks like it's changed now: "Arrest over ‘hanging’ effigies of Rangers fans at Celtic game" Never mind bhoys, a good laugh while it lasted, eh, mischief makin' wee craturs that ye are. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,306 Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 And it is still wrong, as it was a Rangers fan (singular) and an Orangeman (singular) that were being hung. To ignore this vital distinction is to try to ignore the fact that this was a clearly religiously motivated, pre-meditated hate crime. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 And it is still wrong, as it was a Rangers fan (singular) and an Orangeman (singular) that were being hung. To ignore this vital distinction is to try to ignore the fact that this was a clearly religiously motivated, pre-meditated hate crime. quite right bringing us neatly on to what they are going to be charged with and the resulting sentence. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuGers 477 Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 And it is still wrong, as it was a Rangers fan (singular) and an Orangeman (singular) that were being hung. To ignore this vital distinction is to try to ignore the fact that this was a clearly religiously motivated, pre-meditated hate crime. The vital point that is now being redacted from history. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 quite right bringing us neatly on to what they are going to be charged with and the resulting sentence. If it was a Celtic scarf it would have been indecent exposure. inciting a riot? Probably a sectarian football thing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted September 21, 2016 Share Posted September 21, 2016 One was a female blow up apparently, they got the guys DNA from the semen in the doll? lol 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.