jhunter 0 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 The board could have done more, we all could have done more, It's always the case that more could have been done. But McCoist promised to support the board and then reneged, the actions of a conman. throws all those fucking awful signings into new light honest mistakes? aye right. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 He won us 9 in a row but seems determined to do the same for celtc. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,340 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 I don't think he's ever forgiven the board for not reinstating him as manager when they took over 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 I don't think he's ever forgiven the board for not reinstating him as manager when they took over Got to agree with this 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Me too. He still thinks he did a great job. Said we had many more happy days than sad ones under him etc. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,486 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Will the board look to hold an EGM to get this pushed through? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,325 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Will the board look to hold an EGM to get this pushed through? Who knows, but this is always an option. Likewise, while everyone give it to McCoist, the result as it stands means, unless I am mistaken, that a share issue can and probably will happen and if Ashley, Sports Direct and the Eadales want to keep their %, they will have to stump up cash that will go to the club. And who knows whether they all will do that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinker 887 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Will the board look to hold an EGM to get this pushed through? I think if a do-over was organised we'd get a lot higher turnout. It's also possible that Ally, rather than deliberately derailing the resolution, just didn't bother his arse and would vote in favour if there was a second vote. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Who knows, but this is always an option. Likewise, while everyone give it to McCoist, the result as it stands means, unless I am mistaken, that a share issue can and probably will happen and if Ashley, Sports Direct and the Eadales want to keep their %, they will have to stump up cash that will go to the club. And who knows whether they all will do that. It depends what they are in it for. Even out of pure spite far less a longer strategy (say to eventually regain control and re-appoint Ally,....aaaaaaaaaaaaargh) they might look to increase their percentage. They could do this unless everyone else spends to keep their relevant percentages up. The dual ownership/interest thing is hardly a tight binding and, in any case, Ashley could just pass on an excess percentage to a docile pal/acquaintance. That's if anyone actually tried to hold him to it and there seems little appetite for that or much legal weight behind the concept. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,273 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 There goes that old saying , ONCE A RANGER ALWAYS A RANGER . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.