Jump to content

 

 

Nil By Mouth survey on Strict Liability


Recommended Posts

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12391481.SNP_by_election_candidate_quits_five_days_after_selection/

 

Nil by Mouth is a registered Scottish Charity

 

James Dornan MSP is bringing forward a private members bill

under Scottish charity law he was deemed an "undischarged bankrupt" and disqualified from being a charity trustee.

 

they can shove their proposal as far up themselves as they can get it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't even open the link as I know exactly what NBM will be on about and what their agenda is.

They are a discredited mouthpiece for the more rabid manks.

On principle I'm against anything that crowd want to promote.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't even open the link as I know exactly what NBM will be on about and what their agenda is.

They are a discredited mouthpiece for the more rabid manks.

On principle I'm against anything that crowd want to promote.

 

On the contrary, it is vitally important that we Rangers fans complete this survey, telling them exactly what we (should) think of strict liability and their back-door attempts at yet more bias and corruption being shown towards their vile club.

 

If we manage to get a very high number that completes this and says no to strict liability, where does that leave them?

 

We must play the game here, not shut the door and stuff our fingers in our ears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the contrary, it is vitally important that we Rangers fans complete this survey, telling them exactly what we (should) think of strict liability and their back-door attempts at yet more bias and corruption being shown towards their vile club.

 

If we manage to get a very high number that completes this and says no to strict liability, where does that leave them?

 

We must play the game here, not shut the door and stuff our fingers in our ears.

 

Exactly. Complete it. It's an opportunity to demonstrate they should be irrelevant given their bias.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Q.Strict liability for what?

A. For the stuff which attracted the wrath of polis and PFs under the benighted Offensive Behaviour at Football Act, that's what.

 

It seems to me from recent experience, (for a fair no of years), that The Bold Fenian Men could jump up and down at the piggery,

waving loaded Armalite rifles, and that this would not fall within the purview of of the strict liabilities of fhilthfootballclub.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.