Jump to content

 

 

Prince Andrew & Boris Johnson


Recommended Posts

Not sure what the requirement for proof is in US courts. Prince Andrew states that he’s never met Virginia Giuffre, if that’s the case she requires a witness to lie under oath that they have in fact met? The photo could be a phoney. 
The fact that Prince Andrew has used every legal method not to appear in court or even talk to the authorities in New York does make it look like he has something to hide. Also not a good look for the Queen  to be sheltering him.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely, in this day and age, it isn't hard to verify the authenticity of a photograph?

 

I'm not sure what people want the Queen to do...drag Andrew to the US?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BEARGER said:

Not sure what the requirement for proof is in US courts. Prince Andrew states that he’s never met Virginia Giuffre, if that’s the case she requires a witness to lie under oath that they have in fact met? The photo could be a phoney. 
The fact that Prince Andrew has used every legal method not to appear in court or even talk to the authorities in New York does make it look like he has something to hide. Also not a good look for the Queen  to be sheltering him.

 

Isn't there a picture of them together with Ms Maxwell that is in the press quite often? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ChelseaBoy said:

Isn't there a picture of them together with Ms Maxwell that is in the press quite often? 

Yes, that’s the one I said could be phoney. As far as I know no expert has stated it’s an original non edited photo. Something that would be used in court by either side?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite sure Ms Maxwell knows all the names addresses of all the attendees and this could be a nice bargaining chip if she gets a retrial and found  guilty of any charges, .

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is part of Prince Andrew latest input to court in Manhattan. If he’s never met her the photo must be a fake, why cannot he not deny the allegation? Is this a legal standpoint, any legal eagles on.

 

"Prince Andrew lacks sufficient information to admit or deny the allegation that there exists photographic evidence of his alleged meeting with Giuffre," says his legal response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BEARGER said:

This is part of Prince Andrew latest input to court in Manhattan. If he’s never met her the photo must be a fake, why cannot he not deny the allegation? Is this a legal standpoint, any legal eagles on.

 

"Prince Andrew lacks sufficient information to admit or deny the allegation that there exists photographic evidence of his alleged meeting with Giuffre," says his legal response.

I just cannot believe after that picture being used thousands of times across the worlds media that they may be questioning its validity. Most media would have ways of checking surely? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.