Jump to content

 

 

[FT] Aberdeen 1 - 1 Rangers (Tavernier 90+4pen)


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I was just having a laugh. 

 

I agree with you. 

We have a terrible tenancy to single players out after a bad performance and result when the focus should be on the team performance. 

 

Only one player gets pass marks from me today and that's Cifuentes as he had a terrific 2nd half

Edited by CammyF
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I mean, you did incorrectly assume some of us were happy with a point, and incorrectly assumed that we were not disappointed. 

 

He's not far off. 

Show me where I mentioned Gonzo being happy with a point? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

Can’t understand the Aberdeen managers meltdown about our penalty. It’s almost as if they don’t want the rules

to apply if it benefits us.

Basically, our penalties have to be controversial. That's the set narrative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CammyF said:

 

 

Only one player gets pass marks from me today and that's Cifuentes as he had a terrific 2

He did much better in the second half granted, but I must have missed his moments where he put his stamp on the game. I thought he was as effective as his teammates. That would be not very.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, CammyF said:

We have a terrible tenancy to single players out after a bad performance and result when the focus should be on the team performance. 

 

Only one player gets pass marks from me today and that's Cifuentes as he had a terrific 2

I only singled out Lammers because he missed that one chance. That's it. I can't moan at the whole team for missing that chance. 

 

I moaned at Balogun earlier. 

 

And Lundstram. 

 

And Lawrence and Cantwell, indirectly.

 

You're making a mountain out of a molehill. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CammyF said:

Show me where I mentioned Gonzo being happy with a point? 

I didn't mention Gonzo. 

 

You said "For all those happy / settling for a point". You've assumed some are happy with a point. I don't think anyone has said they are happy with a point. I said it wasn't a bad result, given the circumstances. I'm still disappointed. 

 

This is silly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I mean, you did incorrectly assume some of us were happy with a point, and incorrectly assumed that we were not disappointed. 

 

He's not far off. 

Some do appear happy with a point and others have pointed this out  - do you only read and reply to my posts? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.