Season Review Dethroned in the Comatorium

[CammyF 9,446]

2 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said:

I just ignored that question because I don't think it is important enough to answer.

So why say it if it isn't important?

 

You specifically said we must have European "success" before we can move forward. That's a significant claim, yet now its not important? 

 

So how many years of EL success would it take for us to move forward?

 

1, 2, 5, 10?

[ranger_syntax 4,816]

Asking how many years is not important.

[CammyF 9,446]

3 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said:

Asking how many years is not important.

You were the one who claimed we can't move forward unless we are successful in Europe. 

 

I'll rephrase the quesrion ;

 

In your opinion what parameters do we need to reach or breach in Europe to allow us to move forward? 

[ranger_syntax 4,816]

I don't want to rephrase my dismissal of this unimportant question.

 

I would just end up sounding like a vinyl disc which traps the needle in a single groove.

 

That would be unbearable for almost everybody here.

[compo 7,934]

2 hours ago, ranger_syntax said:

One area where success is required, but not achieved, is player trading.

 

The board have been stating this for a while.

Complete amateurs in this department 

[CammyF 9,446]

7 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said:

I don't want to rephrase my dismissal of this unimportant question.

 

I would just end up sounding like a vinyl disc which traps the needle in a single groove.

 

That would be unbearable for almost everybody here.

So for clarity, we don't need success in Europe to move forward? 

 

It's just you made it sound soooooooo (sorry my needle was trapped in the groove, a wee dunt got it free) important 

Edited 3 hours ago by CammyF

[ranger_syntax 4,816]

Why not respond to something I posted?

 

Admin will be after you.

[CammyF 9,446]

2 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said:

Why not respond to something I posted?

 

Admin will be after you.

I have, but you refuse to answer as per usual.

 

This board have taken us further from our objectives with every passing season, so they are a complete and utter failure. 

 

They have taken us to a state where we can't operate without loans despite our income rising to £95M. So it that respect they are a complete and utterly failure. 

 

The board themselves agree that without new investors the club won't move forward.

 

I think they are a complete failure you don't, but offer no defence of evidence that they have not been a complete failure. 

 

The one "success" you claim hasn't helped us move forward, so therefore it's part of the overall failure. 

[ranger_syntax 4,816]

18 minutes ago, CammyF said:

So for clarity, we don't need success in Europe to move forward? 

Check this out.

 

An unambiguous attempt to re-frame what I said as something that I never said.

[ranger_syntax 4,816]

8 minutes ago, CammyF said:

I think they are a complete failure you don't, but offer no defence of[sic] evidence that they have not been a complete failure.

Check this out.

 

An unambiguous attempt to misrepresent my posts.