North Rd

Scroll down, near bottom

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/rolls/supreme/lists/r130926_024.htm

Hmmm well I always thought it was him or his ex PA.

looks to me like whyte is the leak but the info is from his pal ahmed.

And Whyte passed it on to CF.

So, McMurdo friend is the leaker according to CF!

Great post

http://themanthebheastscanttame.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/always-bet-on-black/

Don't understand them, thought they were in partnership with Green ( Shares)

RANGERS Football Club is aware of wildly inaccurate stories circulating on various websites and would like fans to know that these flights of fantasy will be monitored by our lawyers.

In particular, they are examining a malicious piece which seems to suggest that the Club does not own its facilities.

We urge Rangers fans to treat these idiotic and lumbering articles with the contempt they deserve. Better still, ignore them completely.

But we must also stress we cannot waste time responding publicly to every blog or ridiculous claim against this Club. Also, there is a dangerous proliferation of anonymous obsessives on various social media sites and we will not give them any credence.

Nor can we react to every journalist and publication who appear to pursue an anti-Rangers agenda, publications such as the Daily Record which today boasts yet another headline which does not accurately reflect what manager Ally McCoist said in his press conference yesterday.

This paper's intent is clear and we urge our fans to see it for what it is. If Rangers fans want the truth they will find it only on the Club's official platforms.

Finally, Jack Irvine of Media House does not speak for this Club.

I hear the Green camp are saying they have 70% and McColl will get embarrassed .

But, who believes anything that comes out the green camp.

Find it hard to believe myself, ain't he got a good system going down there !

Found another link:

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/418395/Mike-Ashley-eyeing-Rangers-move-from-Newcastle

Half way down.....

http://www.nufc.com/

You've been reading David Low!

 

Cazenove were listed as having 800k less shares than the Laxey deal entailed.

Yes, said his source was sound

Laxey went 0 to 3.25m announced 13Aug. If the rules are complied with this came from > 1 seller as no > 3% shareholder declared sale

I'm hearing recent RFC share sales came from Cazenove (MM side) and gone to Laxey who will support change @ RFC = neutral.

Bear gives Mad 20 names a doing on Celtics Tax and hiding debts.....

so phil celtic are free from external debt you claim?

are you aware of the seven secured charges or mortgages against celtic park the asset?

1) co-op date of active charge 10/06/2011

2) Glasgow city council date of charge 11/05/2009

3) Glasgow city council date of charge 11/05/2009

4) co-op bank date of charge 30/04/2009

5) co-op bank date of charge 30/04/2009

6)the Scottish ministers date of charge 28/07/2006

7) co- op bank date of charge 01/06/2001

are you aware that these charges are described on companies house as seven secured mortgages and active?

no external debt?

donâ??t think so

any chance of an answer of the last time celtic paid corporation tax?

July 3, 2013 at 6:00 pmReply

Phil - The Failed Journalist

Please read my comments carefully (or get someone to help you with them).

â??Zero NET debtâ??.

There thereâ?¦.

July 4, 2013 at 2:50 am

nearly there

ah phil so your saying there is plenty of gross debt then?

July 4, 2013 at 9:28 am

nearly there

and i see you never answered the question on corporation tax phil. so read this and maybe get somebody to read it to you slowly, how much of the apparent 14.94 million grossed of celticâ??s supposed profit did they pay in corporation tax?

July 4, 2013 at 10:39 am

Phil - The Failed Journalist

Until I see evidence to the contrary (like an HMRC investigation) then I can only conclude that Celtic are tax compliant

July 4, 2013 at 11:43 am

nearly there

phil i never asked you that, i asked how much did they pay in corporation tax for the accounts up to dec 2012. simple enough question

July 4, 2013 at 11:55 am

Phil - The Failed Journalist

Quite simply Celtic are either tax compliant or they are not.

The absence of an HMRC probe would seem to answer that one.

July 4, 2013 at 11:57 am

itim1967

Since the lands acquired were for the redevelopment of Celtic park I donâ??t think the big team in Glasgow will be selling them off anytime soon, do you? What would you suggest the council do with the land? build a public park with a boating pond, behave yourself. As Iâ??ve stated before your own deceased club benefited from a similar deal when they were refurbishing their ain midden. Youâ??d think you would be celebrating your new wee teams first and probably last piece of silverware instead of concerning yourself with such trivial matters.

July 4, 2013 at 2:09 pm

nearly there

so you dont want to answer it phil, it really is a simple question, ill repeat it again, how much corporation tax did celtic pay on their apparent grossed up profit for dec 2012 accounts on the 14.94 million (apparently)?

just answer the question or get someone to read it to you, and then answer

July 4, 2013 at 12:01 pm

nearly there

itim you are displaying a clear lack of understanding. one the charges for lands gifted or sold have nothing to do with developing celtic park as to my knowledge that was done in 1994. read the charges I posted these were for may 2009. now im sure you are fully aware as you are a top notch accountant that no solicitor would wait 15 years to register charges against property. and for the record never has there been charges registered against ibrox park. so I assume your accusation about similar deals done for rangers may be in your head

July 4, 2013 at 7:49 pm

nearly there

still no answer phil to a very simple question, how much corporation tax paid by celtic, for the gross 14.94 million supposed operating profit from their accounts dec 2012? now I have not mentioned compliance or anything to do with compliance, just how much did they pay from the dec 2012 accounts. really simple to answer, if you donâ??t know just say.

now to really confuse you phil, when was the last known time celtic paid corporation tax?

Much of this is not official info, still, I deem it important enough to share:

 

There apparently was a board meeting at Ibrox today, where those in attendance were given the results of the independent investigation about the clubs and its (former) officials dealing with Whyte:

 

 

 

More if it is available and can be verified.

 

Thread on FF

What's Member Suite Patron?

frankly I would be more inclined to get into green about the fact he has raised 37 million and spunked 29 million of that on little or nothing tangible so far as I can see.

 

except winning div 3 in a very poor fashion.

He has previous for that in the Middle East.

@dl2068 I already follow you Frankie

Could it be .....Tommo?

He saved the Club! FFS, no one else had a chance to get their hands on it with Dumb&Dumber running the show. He is a Spiv

Current Rangers director Ahmad emailing Whyte, Chris Morgan and Rafat Rivzi. AFTER SEVCO SCOTLAND TOOK OVER on June 20th!!

@CharlotteFakes: It's clear to me that there's a reason for removing Malcolm Murray. He's the only one capable of stopping these rogues taking everything. Is Whyte trying to warn us