BlueGates

If you can let me know how to do this blueflag I can do this tomorrow when I am back at work.

Good luck to the lad. Be interesting to see his fitness levels. Assuming he's been pre - season training with them

I've emailed her and called her. She won't respond to me

As you know Christine personally and she's avoiding me, can you ask her permission got me to post her emails?

I can only go by her email responses to me Greg. And then her follow up failure to respond to 3 mails and 2 calls to her. But hey, they have further information. I'm sure you'll be able to find what this is and release it.

You'll back this up with some facts and proof?

We all make mistakes.

I can honestly say that I did. We may well be.

I really haven't. ? You'll also find RM was well behind RF ?

So you're happy they've lied. Cool. That's all I needed to know. My pledge is if I get the correct apology I will sign up. And it'll be as a life member ?

Have you asked similar questions to Christine and C1872. Apparently they have 'further information' - in the interests of transparency surely we all wish to see this. Or maybe that's not your wish and you're happy that this WP can get away with lies to its members and prospective members?

What's to elaborate on... I was banned for no reason. RST was promoted on FF while RF threads were constantly deleted. The point is, I was looking to join C1872 (still am if the correct action is taken) The email states everyone deserves to have the past put behind them and a fresh start allowed.

RST was due to FF. Checkered pasts - we've all heard 'accusations' , my question said everyone deserves a clean slate. Chris Jack - releasing results prior to official releases. Valid question. Rental space - question prior to it being confirmed. Ensuring funds are being spent appropriately. Again. All questions were posted on RM pre the email over a period of time ? You obviously see what you want to see. Once again, that's your choice and I respect that.

I deleted my post in error. Here's a screenshot of my reply though.

I just feel after the accusations made, a private apology would be better. C1872 has great potential, and I am sure given time the right people can and will take it forward. But, these things are just plain stupid to do - hence why I personally feel they would be better without the guilty party involved.

As I've stated, my post only went online after my initial email was ignored and Greg told me to resend it. If I had an agenda or such, I would be posting up all communications I've had with two members of C1872. Both of which have stopped replying to emails, of which there was IMO good communications initially. I was satisfied with most responses and would not have taken it further. C1872 could have dealt with this directly with me, and could have avoided them not making the first move and going online with their accusations. I am happy to leave this here, and open the floor for someone in C1872 to email me to close this off. I think that is the fairest way forward... The choice is there's now. However, refusing to communicate would further back up an insistence to cover up the wrongdoing of someone their side

Those were questions that I had asked as things were appearing since the vote was coming together, and that Greg couldn't answer. If Greg was able to - he answered a lot more than I asked in the email - then I wouldn't have needed to send the mail. I can't disprove your thoughts or opinion Pete and nor can you prove them. I can I only say I'm an average punter wanting a bit of honesty and transparency. That is all. At the moment - my questions have been answered and I was more than happy to leave it at that. It was agreed with Christine we would both be honest and keep things confidential. That was until I was being accused of all sorts. It was only after Fury posted about me on here that I joined to put my response across. ?

Hi Boabie. You are correct in what you are saying. I haven't paid in to a fan scheme. The questions I collated were questions that had been asked over a period of time to Greg Marshall over a few threads on RM the preceding month or so. I respect Greg highly for his attempts at fielding so many questions and how he handled the slanderous blog about him as well.

I've nothing to hide but will abide by the board rules if I am breaching them ?

Personal I think it may have been down to my opening statement regarding transparency... which is quite ironic

I appreciate your honesty and opinion. After all that's all we can go on from here. I can only reiterate I don't. My engagement I had with Christine prior to her going silent was good and her soundbites made me believe she hoped for better and change. It was never going to be perfect from day one - and my emails to her stated I felt EVERYONE involved deserved a clean slate. I still feel that is the case - but, their handling of my emails has muddied that. As stated an apology from the person to me will see me sign up for C1872. I don't think I can be anymore fair than that.

Hi Buster, I posted on here after a poster here made reference to me being discussed on this thread by Fury. I think it was fair that I defended myself. If you see the timeline of events on RM, you will see I asked Greg Marshall why people were not getting replies to messages, this was 3 weeks after I had emailed. The screenshots are there for all to see - although a Mod has anonymised my details. I have no agenda here, and I had promised that if this was sorted and C1872 had the guilty party apologise to me it would go a long way and I would join it as they would have dealt with the issue in the correct manner. I can at least hold my head high in knowing I have acted appropriately and in a dignified manner. It is a shame others haven't.

First thing that popped up on google... https://support.twitter.com/articles/20170001

You can search for a twitter account using someones email.

Ah that's good to know. So, finally after how long has it taken to find out who was in charge of emails that day. Additionally, I was starting to worry that something had happened to you after the subsequent emails and calls I made have sent were ignored. Let me guess, at 3:54am in the morning when I was unblocked from Twitter you also had access to the email then? Why were you so keen to press this - "Naming and shaming a person would be in anyone's interests and hopefully you will accept our apology and move on" You would not be apologising for something if it did not happen, you see, that's when it all became clear it was either you, or someone very close to you. Do the honourable thing Christine and admit it and resign, or out who it was. Either that, or I would suggest contacting the Police as someone has hacked your email system... Could that ever happen?