Guest Dummiesoot Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 more on that needs to come out. guilty by association only applies to Rangers, oleg 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,299 Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 (edited) guilty by association only applies to Rangers, oleg This is where CG & JT need to earn their money. If JT has anything on Regan & the SFA in general he needs to use this ammunition in the months ahead which I see being very turbulent indeed due to financial promises being made regards reconstruction which cannot be fulfilled unless the financial contributors to scottish football are prepared to take a hit for another season without us in the top division or they may simply walk away altogether Edited February 3, 2013 by RANGERRAB 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,299 Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 Rhegan hand picked to be the sellik patsy in the sfa. he was incompetent at ycb and is worse here. i think his brother's well known support for the iranaways got sthewartybhoy his job. was it not reid's son & nolan partners who interviewed rhegan for the job. question is, was anyone else interviewed ? if so who & by whom? One of the Rangers websites (think it was RM) questioned this and got a letter from the SFA's lawyers then in true Rhegan style he went on TV and said he was head-hunted with the implication that no one else was interviewed 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,118 Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 "We don't do walking away" will be used against us for ever more. We better get used to it. My reply would be "sporting integrity". 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dummiesoot Posted February 3, 2013 Share Posted February 3, 2013 was it not reid's son & nolan partners who interviewed rhegan for the job. question is, was anyone else interviewed ? if so who & by whom?One of the Rangers websites (think it was RM) questioned this and got a letter from the SFA's lawyers then in true Rhegan style he went on TV and said he was head-hunted with the implication that no one else was interviewed he has suggested he was head hunted he has also suggested he was asked to apply. it was indeed nolan and partners - selliks headhunters that went for sthewartybhoy. liewell in think (or perhaps his son) worked at miller coors together. just coincidence of course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,299 Posted February 3, 2013 Author Share Posted February 3, 2013 he has suggested he was head hunted he has also suggested he was asked to apply. it was indeed nolan and partners - selliks headhunters that went for sthewartybhoy. liewell in think (or perhaps his son) worked at miller coors together. just coincidence of course. Liewell & Regan worked together at Coors. That's well known. What needs to be asked is what made Regan prime candidate for the position of SFA Chief Exec. His recent CV is one of abject failure at YCC. Why was he selected & by whom for SFA chief exec ? were there other candidates ? who were they ? why were they not selected? a whole serious oof questions need to be asked about this appointment Perhaps Daly might want to make a documentary about this. Yet again probably not as we know his allegiances too. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.