Jump to content

 

 

andrew_2010

  • Posts

    912
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by andrew_2010

  1. Watched the BBC "highlights". Total shambles. Watch the ones in the original post. (cheers for the link, but the amount of chances that didn't make the BBC cut, or their lack of significant replays and missing certain angles is shocking! surely that can't be incompetence that made them miss the damning angle of wanyamas definite red card?! can it?!)

  2. why has he resigned? did he do something in particular that put him under the microscope? I tend to put the majority of mistakes down to incompetence rather than institutional bias, other than perhaps the refs who try to prove a point by not being afraid to give decisions against us so go looking for crimes that aren't there...

  3. Well if the "big tax case" hasn't been finalised, can HMRC ask for administration? I mean, that bill is in dispute, and therefore not due until they declare it? I don't know, but this seems like a big game of chicken, and I hope Whyte has done everything legally and protected all that needs protecting and this plays out in a way that will have all this nonsense finished with before the start of next season (barring the inevitable recovery period on the field)

  4. One of the only positives I can take out of this, is that we'll have to adopt a more 433 formation, and refrain from the constant long ball. Well at least until lafferty returns. I don't think it's a coincidence that our two good home results (barring the second half vs celtic) have occurred when we didn't have a big striker and had to reply on working the ball more for our opportunities.

     

    Still a shambolic transfer window with worrying times ahead, but keep believing, and you never know. Imagine what would happen across the city if we did win the league?!

  5. As far as I know, they are encouraging settling before this case, as if you choose to settle, and pay the tax/penalties/interest, then you will not be able to get it back if they lose the Rangers case. So they are trying to get some people to pay some money in case the courts say that the people in questions are not due anything. Pretty rotten...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.