trueblue 64

2 hours ago, Fa1833 said:

100% made me pop a few blood vessels passing straight from the back 🤣 , I thought we were a shambles first half didn’t look at home whatsoever, whatever the 👨‍🦲 one said at half time worked to a certain extent. 

Any truth in the rumour Gordon fucking Ramsey popped his head in.

We need to go back to the good old days. A league should be each team playing every team the same number of times home and away. A cup should be straight knock out played over one or two legs. 

Another obvious reason for European officials, happening far too often in OF matches.

With the amount of money involved in the game now surely neutral foreign referees are a viable option for league matches.

Brave cunts

Staying that late.

4 minutes ago, BlackSocksRedTops said:

1978 - PSV 2 Rangers 3

1999 - PSV 0 Rangers 1

2011 - PSV 0 Rangers 0

2022 - PSV 0 Rangers 1

 

They really must hate us....

They love us, turned up in their thousands to welcome the team off the bus.

2 hours ago, BlackSocksRedTops said:

Don't bother. Get an official exemption letter from the TV licence people. It's easy. Don't watch or listen to any output from the BBC. Simple.

The burden of proof is on them to prove I use this service not me to disprove it. Had a similar situation with the post office when I told them to stop putting unaddressed mail in my letter box, was told I had to apply to the post master to opt out of something I never opted into. The only unaddressed mail I receive now is from the snp who seem to ignore the sign on my door, they're next on my list.

26 minutes ago, Waltersgotstyle said:

Kilmarnock like Livingston last week had no intention of playing football. The fact that their defender was trying to waste time midway through the first half just confirmed it.

 

I can’t ever remember teams being this negative during the 90s or early 00s. 

 

Domestic games are quickly becoming horrible to watch.

Last season league and Europe were night and day in terms of time, atmosphere, excitement and cash earned, big believer in Atlantic league.

Still no getting my license fee, started doing return to sender with their correspondence recently so they sent one of their goons round, couldn't get back in his car quick enough when I asked to see his business insurance. 

I wouldn't have played Diallo again after his showing at the paedodome, he's looked more committed recently but still not justified being here.

The question I want answered is why was Murray's offer to settle for a one off payment rejected when many clubs in England were accepted.

4 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said:

I thought that people who have tested positive had to isolate.

 

This is all pointless.

Only if they know they have it, most are probably symptom less.

It's pointless asking for proof of vaccination as you can still catch and spread it, if you're negative you can't spread it.

Being positive spreads it so proving you're negative is more effective than proving you've been vaccinated

8 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said:

Does the vaccine prevent the spread of the virus?

If it's to curtail the spread of the virus surely a negative test would be more effective.

Missed a trick with the larger one, a couple of pounds more would would have taken it to 169.00.

18 hours ago, craig said:

Here was me thinking that this thread was about our covid "outbreak" and not our strength of squad.  I must have missed something

When the story broke all sorts of lists were being posted and everyone was really anxious, that post stated none of them were correct and we would still have a strong squad regardless. I certainly slept a lot easier after reading it. If we didn't have such a strong squad we could have been fielding a B team tonight so they're definitely linked.

52 minutes ago, craig said:

That's a lot of words to say basically nothing.

Seems he was right that we still have a relatively strong squad.

That guy on FF has a good reputation.

Couldn't even stomach the first paragraph.

For God sake, I see trouble ahead.

Budge has obviously contacted mid table premiership teams who said absolutely no.

We should send a courier round with a notice of legal proceedings if we don't get an independent enquiry at 9am, he could also deliver our application for a loan. Imagine we tied them up for months and they still had to loan every club their own monies.

36 minutes ago, compo said:

I know it will never happen but to boycott the lot of their grounds would be a nice show of unity by our supporters the club could join in by refusing all tickets for away matches 

THIS. The bears who still want their away day can still go along with no tickets and support the team from outside, just imagine the impact if there were more fans outside than inside. Donate your ticket money to Rangers charities.

I must be in the minority but I think it's a very good statement, very calculated and clear without being too bitter sounding. We have reiterated our stance and put our objections forward clearly and made the second demand for their removal. The first statement was was acted on with their internal investigation, this statement and SG comments show we are not letting this go. They cant now ignore us, they must be seen to react whether that's charging us or allowing further investigation, they cannot do nothing. I'm pretty certain we have the evidence to see this through or we would have let it go.