RyanGers193

we do. he's publicly made the offer and we know it has not been accepted.

 

he's not actually trying to get us cheap he could do that right now at least to some extent. the current shareholders are trying that. he is trying to invest fresh capital in new shares.

 

if he just wanted to buy us he could do so for far far far far less than 50 million.

He's said it in the media. He's said a lot in the media. Do you know for a fact if he's actually offered it to the board? Or is it just one of Dave's lies?

Even if that was true, why would it be a problem?

Because he has the money to buy them out and doesn't need to resort to dirty tactics.

indeed why would anyone turn it down. but they are.

 

we know they are. kings made the offer and no share issue has been held.

 

if one is and kind doesn't invest that changes. but not till then.

'We' don't know that. I think King is refusing to invest because he thinks he can get us on the cheap.

It might be acceptable to call Dave King a "piece of shit" on other forums, but it's certainly not acceptable here Ryan.

I'm not on any other public forums so I wouldn't know about that.

He is though.

i will bet you he's not allowed to deal?

There is no way of proving that. Why would anyone turn down £50m investement

So in other words no. Cool

fwiw when king puts his 50 million in i don't care how cheap the shares are or not. nor do i care if its easdale who puts it in only that the board realise we need it and go take it when its on offer.

I will bet you £1000 Dave King does not invest £50m in Rangers.

Deal?

so he will buy shares then.

 

when you say on the cheap do you mean less than the 20p a share easdale is about to buy at? or are we talking at 1p a share greenco levels?

17p a share.

why is he lying about it then?

Because he is a shit stirring piece of shit who wants to get us on the cheap by forcing the current board out.

We will never win the Premiership with our current management team.

Chance for Dave King to invest.

He wont though.

fans won't accept it though. they simple won't go.

 

especially when king is offering to pump in 50 million and being refused.

If anyone believes King is willing to invest £50m they need sectioned.

No.

Poor manager and a complete bellend.

Mohsni is sure a good CH, but also likes to move out of "position" himself and as it happens loses the ball in midfield or near the sidelines. He's rather great at breaking up attacks of the opposition and starting moves themselves with decent passes or moving up front himself. I for one wouldn't mind him playing in a sweeper role just ahead of a three- or four-man defence instead of Hutton or even Black - all pending on the opposition. If he's lackadaisical in that area, the impact mind not be as dangerous.

 

Bell

 

Faure - McGregor - Wallace

 

Mohsni

 

Templeton - Law - Macleod - Aird

 

Miller - Clark

 

... should be able to take care of anything the Championship has to throw at us. And it also has enough pace in midfield to back our defence up in times of need.

We wouldn't win the Championship with that team.

As long as they don't use Ibrox I couldn't care less.

Play *new and decent centre half* and Faure with Mohsni, Gasparotto and Halkett as back-ups (plus Jig and Daly on stand-by), while Mohsni goes into defensive midfield. Actually, I'd go with a backline of Faure - *new CH* - Wallace ... and Mohsni right in front of them, dropping back in times of need.

I really hope this isn't a serious post.

Extremely underwhelming at best.

Goodwillie

Surely this is how a team decides what players to sign.

1. Evaluate your squad, decide what positions need strengthening.

2. Identify a player who fits the criteria, whether that be someone to add to the squad depth or to go straight into the first team.

3. Approach the player to see if they are interested.

Our transfer policy? McCoist goes online, see's who is on a free/on the transfer list, prints off a list, puts it on Wallace's desk shouting and pointing 'A WAANT THAT WAN' at various names on the list.

What will you do if God forbid we have a team full of them?

What do you mean what will I do? There is nothing I could do about it, I'd be absolutely disgusted but couldn't 'do' anything.

Acht well I bow to your staunchness

I don't see what is staunch about disliking ex celtic players/supporters.

But thank you.

Not extreme at all - I thought it was only the dark side that cared about peoples 'upbringing'

 

You know what, the more of 'them' we sign the more upset they get.

Well you thought wrong.

Acht more BS from McCoist - how dare he try to defend his record of playing graduates of 'Murray Park'. How dare he respond to fans criticism of his handling of thr Telfer situation. Now back in your box Ally and shut the **** up.

 

Ps - cant believe I am defending him again....

My thoughts exactly.

Stuart McCall's name being mentioned due to the Leanne Dempster connection.

Wilbert will back up the Lampard thing.

Staunch.....

 

Don't forget John Spencer.....

 

In saying that I don't allow my kids to eat 'greens', drink lime juice, use green straws or wear anything green. In fact I removed them from nursery as they one of them was put in the green group.

 

Behaving worse than tims here....

That seems a bit extreme, have a word with yourself.

"Judas" shut a few people up in his 2nd spell at the club and I'm sure his third will be similar

Nah he'll always be a judas.