kuznetsov

why would a tim show concern for rangers? they are more inclined to want ally knighted, certainly give him as much time as he needs to fail time after time, believe every word green says and speak no criticism of rangers whatsoever.

i think there is more chance of bomber being right!

no one can say categorically no. only time will tell if he is right or not. by then, it maybe too late again.

was bomber correct all along?

administration? fans money stolen? shite manager kept in a job to keep fans happy and deflect from the truth behind the scenes?

being loyal with an acceptance of utter dross does no party any good though.

we have known for years the annual awards were biased and heavily dominated by celtic players.

bernard stephen.

stb, how else would you describe fans who pay fortunes to turn up week in week out and watch anti football? never mind falling for every word charlie says.

they were right last time about whyte the 1st.

i dont see it either. he will take his dough and run.

arnt they one in the same?

A new league set-up of 24 teams in two divisions. A 14-game play-off system between the bottom four clubs of the top tier and the top four clubs of the second tier. Binning the now-toxic SPL brand. i like the look of this. poor gordon smith had loads of great ideas but because he was rangers minded he was hounded out.

its also a poor comparison in that the english game works, it is the best and biggest in the world. they dont need change nor do they need rangers or anyone else coming in.

sell up/cut his losses and walk.

i am going on greens desperation that interest is not what he or the investors thought it would be.

the sfl were never going to dictate to the spl. it is deluded to think so nor will there be any radical change to the game up here. the authorities have it how they like it. rangers out and celtic dominating.

green is trying too hard to sell these shares. that tells me interest is not as big as he wanted or hoped. this share issue may well be another flop. people with the kind of money green wants are rarely duped by such poor sales pitches.

interesting question. would he not be automatically entitled to a dividend if he was on the board anyway? to answer your question, for me it would depend just how wise or daft that say is like, how ambitious is king? does he want the club to go where i want it to? do we share the same expectations?

dont beat yourself up about it mate, almost every thread goes off topic at some point.

annual turnover is a decent guide minus tv money. all money any given club can generate over a financial year less tv money would be the best guide. as tv money is so diverse the world over, it is not a fair reflection of a clubs size. just look at epl's bottom 10 clubs. smallish clubs with 50 million in tv money added to their turnover every year for simply participating in that countries league.

wow. i would day they were one of the worlds real super powers.

we would be much higher if we had a bigger stadium.

i dont think attendances determine how big a club is. just look at chelsea and liverpool with smaller stadia than say newcastle and, us!

bigger than inter milan? schalke are also a huge club, in germany certainly.