Briton

7 hours ago, Scott7 said:

If Rangers had a placeman in the SFA who made a disparaging remark abour celtic all the rattler...

You are correct in what you say but just lost the argument.

Listened to this last; good job.

On 5/18/2018 at 14:09, lenny3k said:

good player who should step up with better players around him...

My concern with him is his delivery, I don't see that being improved by having better players around him. 

4 hours ago, Gaffer said:

I'm afraid that it's you that's twisting words with that statement.  Just because someone votes YES doesn't mean they hate the UK.  People will vote YES for all sorts of reasons.

 

You always want to bring politics into football.  I wish you'd stop it.  It's counter productive and only segregates the support.  We are all Rangers fans.  Some of us will vote for parties that others don't like.  That's politics.  We all support Rangers.  That's football.  Let's not mix them up.

Some of us, shock horror, may even be republicans (which wouldn't mean you hate the Royal Family either).

10 hours ago, barca72 said:

I don't agree with with just about anything connected with the R.C. church, but I do not agree with this kind of personal abuse.
Surely a person should be allowed to freely choose and practice their own religion without this kind of offensive attack.

The point is that people don't get to choose which flavour of this mumbo jumbo they happened to be born into; choice is rarely a factor.  Abusing someone because they were born into Catholicism (or anything else) is moronic.

39 minutes ago, pete said:

Welcome and you are correct, collapse means no way back.

Thanks for the welcome; although I thought I was a member before but my email addy wasn't recognised.

Obviously they did get on top of us after the penalty debacle  but  they created very little. I remember them hitting the bar with a long range shot (that JA should have saved).  The first real chance of the game was Morelos' header and we looked the more likely to win it for most of the second half.  We reacted poorly to going a goal behind but we didn't collapse.

8 hours ago, StuGers said:

I understand what you are saying, but even with our collapse, we didn’t concede! We went on to score 1. The difference between 0-1 and 1-1 was a non-penalty.

'Collapse' is a huge overstatement in any case.