DR - 'Rangers boss Ally McCoist told he'll have to select players to get the sack'

[BlueMazza 0]

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/2012/02/17/rangers-boss-ally-mccoist-told-he-ll-have-to-select-players-to-get-the-sack-86908-23754191/

 

OK so the Record have turned on Rangers recently I get that. What I'm wondering is, where has this come from, when the Administrators said yesterday that redundancies were not a given and also if it IS true, would you not expect Ally McCoist to have input anyway? He's the manager, he has to be involved surely?

 

I hate the media I do. I should stop reading it I know. But then I'd have a lot less to get angry about.

 

So, non news story to 'thicken the plot' and is it done to undermine confidence in the Administrators?

[BlueMazza 0]

Oh and they cut out the best bit of Ally's quote about 'we don't walk anyway'

[Ergatrude 0]

Didn't Ally say yesterday that he has NOT been asked to make a redundancy list?

 

This is exactly why I only read the metro.

[Juancornetto 1]

I stopped reading tabloid newspapers a year or two ago and I can honestly say my life has been improved as a result. None of them have got anything right about events at Rangers...

[Guest Dutchy]

STV are saying the same thing. I've not read the DR article, because I'm getting sick of all this claim and counter claim.

 

http://sport.stv.tv/football/scottish-premier/rangers/297829-rangers-boss-will-have-say-on-player-exits/

[BlueMazza 0]

Ah but at least STV's headline says The administrators for the club say the manager will have an input into any redundancies in his squad.

 

The DR make out it's a foregone conclusion (which it might be but they don't know that yet)

 

 

**54th post. I may stop here hahah **

Edited February 17, 2012 by BlueMazza
randomness

[GovanAllan 0]

Was interesting that Trayknob and Keech Jackson were more interested in trying find a link between the admin team and Whyte and wanting an investigation than they were about anyone losing their job.

[Guest Dutchy]

Ah but at least STV's headline says The administrators for the club say the manager will have an input into any redundancies in his squad.

 

The DR make out it's a foregone conclusion (which it might be but they don't know that yet)

 

 

I think my point is that none of these articles reveal anything new to me and are not worth the effort of reading.

 

I sometimes read what folks on here post, but sometimes not, as I didn't with the DR article. I don't see that they are telling anyone anything diffirent. Basically, there's no new news on this until the admin has had more time to check the books, ect., ect., ect.