Fury 0 Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 New blog is up looking at reasons behind SFA sanctions. http://chrisgraham76.wordpress.com/2012/05/14/sfa-decision-examined/ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,178 Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 Great read as always mate. The SFA have plenty of questions to answer. Let's hope our QC ensures they do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 That is a fantastic summary of events , its no wonder the main stream media dont want this discussed 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juancornetto 1 Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 The points about the wording and tone of the SFA document being very sound-bite friendly is spot on. It's easy to see that it was written with the sole intention of diverting attention from the parts which deal in supposition and theory. The over complicated legalese is also I believe a tactic designed to prevent your average Bear from unpicking the flimsy fabric of the document. It seems the SFA are indulging in some clever public relations....I wonder where (or who) they picked that idea up from? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fury 0 Posted May 14, 2012 Author Share Posted May 14, 2012 The points about the wording and tone of the SFA document being very sound-bite friendly is spot on. It's easy to see that it was written with the sole intention of diverting attention from the parts which deal in supposition and theory. The over complicated legalese is also I believe a tactic designed to prevent your average Bear from unpicking the flimsy fabric of the document. It seems the SFA are indulging in some clever public relations....I wonder where (or who) they picked that idea up from? It certainly has Peter's stench all over it. The line about match fixing was so obviously for the media as to be laughable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 Great read again Chris, as always puts the so called journalists in this country to shame. Hopefully our QC can rip them a new one. Keep up the good work mate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.