Rangers SPL membership

[Thinker 887]

Why would they deliberately induce something worse than Third Lannark's demise?

 

Because they can.

[Guest Dutchy]

Reality is over rated.

 

In the world of science, the realities that give us our TV's, phones and computers are based on mathematical constructions to help us understand the un-reality of the world we live in.

 

In the marcro world of space physics, we created a mathematical models to bend space and time. The results worked.

 

In the micro world, there are many diffirent theories to expaln the quantum world. Even though at face value they all seem to disagree, it depends on what you're looking for and the results work, depending on what you're looking for.

 

EBT's are a mathematical model to avoid tax, although not very morally honest, they were certainly leagal at the time of being applied and they've not been proven yet to have been illegally worked. But worked they did.

 

I'm sure I've read that other SPL clubs have used EBT's as well, just not to the same extend as Rangers used them, so I wait other clubs to be investigated, if thats a true statement.

 

And if it's a true statement, it makes all this sporting integity bullshit even more hypocritical than it seems now.

[Annan Bear 0]

If 23 clubs voted the likes of Elgin City, Peterhead and Annan Athletic into the sfl then why would they not vote Rangers in? Proddy country and for that sole reason we're in.

 

The Annan chairman is a Rangers fan - used to go to games on the same bus

[calscot 0]

One of the biggest farces is that the boards are being pressured by the fans who feel Rangers have to be punished and one of their biggest reasons is due to the EBT's which they have been programmed to see as "financial doping" by Celtic.

 

However, we haven't even been found guilty of wrongdoing and may be exonerated...

 

Celtic had one EBT and then paid the tax. That to me is an explicit, fully PAYE'd, dual contract. Where are the cries for them to be punished? After all, is that not a grievous crime?

 

Either, like us they they may be guilty because they made a mistake (we just made more but how is that worse when our mistake wasn't pointed out for 10 years?) Or unlike us, they didn't make a mistake and had a deliberate, bona fide dual contract.