GovanAllan 0 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 If HMRC object to the transfer of assets then we're not out of the woods yet I thought HMRC had given the newco and asset transfer the green light when it knocked back the CVA. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,306 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Lack of communication = A convenient excuse Exactly. Opportunists & chancers the lot of them. Rangers had to honour their existing contracts. All of them. Why didn't they transfer over then leave ? spare me the excuses for these players please 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 I thought HMRC had given the newco and asset transfer the green light when it knocked back the CVA. They did. Their statement even sugar coated it with how we could carry on debt free in the SPL iirc 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 They did. Their statement even sugar coated it with how we could carry on debt free in the SPL iirc So why would they go back on it, getting me worried here mate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Sorry M8 but I don't think any of the departees had any intention of staying. As I said they saw an opportunity and took it. We can think all we want and speculate about it all till the cooz come home, but if we're simply sticking to hard facts and what we do indeed know, then almost all of the players who've left and also some of those who've stayed have corroborated the claims that the communication from the club was absolutely terrible with most of them having zero communication at all until receiving their tupe letter despite having tried themselves to contact Green and Ally. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 We can think all we want and speculate about it all till the cooz come home, but if we're simply sticking to hard facts and what we do indeed know, then almost all of the players who've left and also some of those who've stayed have corroborated the claims that the communication from the club was absolutely terrible with most of them having zero communication at all until receiving their tupe letter despite having tried themselves to contact Green and Ally. Sorry for butting in guys, but what difference to them would it have made if they had transferred over then club folded, they would've been in the same boat as not transferring over out of a job looking for a club. So the communication about the clubs future kind of falls down does it not. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 So why would they go back on it, getting me worried here mate. Because they can? Who knows what motivated them to go after us the way they did in the first instance. HMRC (or at least some of their employees) had it in for Rangers long before Craig Whyte arrived on the scene. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 We can think all we want and speculate about it all till the cooz come home, but if we're simply sticking to hard facts and what we do indeed know, then almost all of the players who've left and also some of those who've stayed have corroborated the claims that the communication from the club was absolutely terrible with most of them having zero communication at all until receiving their tupe letter despite having tried themselves to contact Green and Ally. And understanding was too much to ask for considering all the club was going through? Like i've said, footballers trying to sugar coat reasons for leaving a club is as common a thing as you can get. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 Sorry for butting in guys, but what difference to them would it have made if they had transferred over then club folded, they would've been in the same boat as not transferring over out of a job looking for a club. So the communication about the clubs future kind of falls down does it not. No it doesn't fall down at all. Our players were not getting spoken to and kept up to date by the club, but instead were getting spoken to by people from the PFA who were feeding them with lies about it being a new club and the history was lost. People from the PFA and certain lawyers basically told our players that Rangers died the day Green's CVA proposal was rejected and the newco swung into action. The people responsible for those communication failures at the club let the club, the players and the fans down big time because we lost over £20m worth of playing assets due to lack of information flow between the club and players. The players should never have been left in the dark and allowed to be fed with a single information stream of agenda-driven lies from PFA Scotland. For me it's not the actions of the players which are almost unforgivable, it's the failures from within the club. Maybe the new owners and certain people within the club didn't see it that way though because they'll have known that restructuring of the wage bill was urgently required and basically what transpired is that ten million quid a year in wages walked out the door. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted August 22, 2012 Share Posted August 22, 2012 People need to make their own conclusions, they can't be spoonfed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.