the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 OK, when are they ever going to say somebody is good for Rangers? mate they didn't say he was bad they knew exactly what he was doing. not paying tax, ticketus etc. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 mate they didn't say he was bad they knew exactly what he was doing. not paying tax, ticketus etc. Phil mcgobble maybe, not on sites like that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 in fairness the likes of forlan, the Weiss man and Canadian bacon knew as well. but people didn't want to believe them any more than the yahoos. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 in fairness the likes of forlan, the Weiss man and Canadian bacon knew as well. but people didn't want to believe them any more than the yahoos. CB is pretty behind Green btw. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 CB is pretty behind Green btw. good for him. his fanzine ran an article insisting whyte still owned us btw. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 good for him. his fanzine ran an article insisting whyte still owned us btw. And like the rest provided brilliant hard proof i'm sure. Frankly we're just giving Whyte and Pacific Quay what they wanted by arguing amongst ourselves about this stuff again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 And like the rest provided brilliant hard proof i'm sure. Frankly we're just giving Whyte and Pacific Quay what they wanted by arguing amongst ourselves about this stuff again. I've yet to see hard proof either way. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 I've yet to see hard proof either way. But why do you necessarily need to prove a negative? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 0 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 And like the rest provided brilliant hard proof i'm sure. Frankly we're just giving Whyte and Pacific Quay what they wanted by arguing amongst ourselves about this stuff again. LOL on RM it was GS and ED! here it is GS and STB , say one thing GS, you fairly like a good old fashioned debate lol 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 yahoo websites had whyte pegged 100% from the off, so no. Nobody had Whyte "pegged" from the off. There are a lot of arrogant people who make a guess on a 50-50 outcome and then take credit for being wise and knowledgeable when they are right. It's like getting a coin toss correct and thinking you're some kind of genius. Whyte was at Rangers and so to them was "bad", the fact he was bad does not make them right in any way. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.