Tom Davison 0 Posted December 18, 2013 Share Posted December 18, 2013 Weird thing is the requisitioners personally hold more shares than the board of RIFC combined. Correct FS. It is a bit rich for the board to be criticising PM for raising a legitimate question over this leak of sensitive information. They don't seem overly concerned that many people who have invested both money and time, in support of our club, over many years, are being treated as irrelevant. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossy 0 Posted December 18, 2013 Share Posted December 18, 2013 I don't doubt that. But a few months ago this seemed quite a close fight. I would've said the requisitioners stood a chance. What happened? The Easdales increased their holding as did Laxey (who then backed board) it swung the pendulum back in the current boards favour and because of that they'll win tomorrow What happened? The requisitioners sat back and let the Board of the hook. They were complacent and failed to realise that they needed to go hard for as many shares as they could. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.