MacK1950 2,249 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Another loss in court to MASH regarding blocking of shareholder voting to stop them continuing blocking sanctions against the shareholders at AGM's. If SD want to block voting at meetings they will have to apply each time in advance under court legislation as a continuation of their previous injunction was dismissed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 (edited) Another loss in court to MASH regarding blocking of shareholder voting to stop them continuing blocking sanctions against the shareholders at AGM's.If SD want to block voting at meetings they will have to apply each time in advance under court legislation as a continuation of their previous injunction was dismissed. There is already a thread running on this mate http://www.gersnetonline.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?75288-Mike-Ashley-fails-to-stop-Rangers-attempts-to-block-his-voting-rights Edited January 27, 2016 by pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts