L72 577 Posted 7 hours ago Author Share Posted 7 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Bluedell said: What underhand deals with the Parks Group? There was the sponsorship deal where they gave the club £5 million upfront, which seems fair enough to me, but I'm not sure if it's this that you're referring to or some other deals? What sponsorship deal? Are you referring to PMG becoming partner to New Edmiston House, the training centre, training range sponsor etc? Because Parks Motor Group didn't pay for that, they just got it. Parks Group later offered £6m to shore up funds to see the takeover through, but it wasn't deemed necessary. Got publicity from Rangers without paying a dime. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueflag 463 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Outgoing board all put there hands in their pockets to take us away from real spivs. Can accept they didn't make good footballing decisions. Terrible on many occasions, but it's rewriting history to suggest otherwise. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 6,364 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 10 minutes ago, L72 said: What sponsorship deal? Are you referring to PMG becoming partner to New Edmiston House, the training centre, training range sponsor etc? Because Parks Motor Group didn't pay for that, they just got it. Ah, so you know better than the auditors of the company? The £5 million in the accounts is just made up? 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
L72 577 Posted 7 hours ago Author Share Posted 7 hours ago Just now, Bluedell said: Ah, so you know better than the auditors of the company? The £5 million in the accounts is just made up? Cool, go find it then. You're talking about the deferred income lifeline 👍🏻 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 6,364 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 11 minutes ago, blueflag said: Outgoing board all put there hands in their pockets to take us away from real spivs. Can accept they didn't make good footballing decisions. Terrible on many occasions, but it's rewriting history to suggest otherwise. And it's frustrating when people just make up stuff about them. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 6,364 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
L72 577 Posted 7 hours ago Author Share Posted 7 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Bluedell said: And it's frustrating when people just make up stuff about them. 2 minutes ago, Bluedell said: Someone better tell Google it is wrong. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 5,025 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago The generative A.I. revolution, and its consequences, have been a disaster for the Gersnet discussion forum. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 6,364 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago FFS. So AI knows the finances of Rangers better than the auditors and the company directors who signed off the accounts as being accurate? The same AI who claimed "Donald Park" was a bus tycoon. 😂 I proven that the £5 million was paid and if you continue to base your view on a spurious AI link rather than the club's audited accounts then knock yourself out. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 6,364 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago In fact let's ask google what note 27 of the accounts says. It doesn't know any of the specifics and it ends up by saying "AI responses may include mistakes".... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.